Since 1929, cosmologists have known that the universe is expanding. Until recently, they assumed that the expansion is slowing as the universe’s own gravity tugs against it. In the late 1990s, astronomers set out to observe the slowing by measuring the distances to exploding stars known as supernovas. To their surprise, the findings meant that the expansion of the universe is actually accelerating.
Cosmologists have proposed two explanations for the accelerated expansion of the universe, each one a challenge to the current conception of the universe. The first and more widely accepted theory posits a kind of “dark energy” that causes space itself to stretch. Recent studies of the afterglow of the big bang have in fact expanding, but Einstein’s orphaned idea may in fact point to what drives the acceleration.
Some cosmologists postulate that the dark energy that drives the accelerated expansion of the universe is created by a class of “virtual” particles. Particle physicists have known for many decades that, thanks to quantum mechanics, the so-called “vacuum” roils with virtual subatomic particles popping in and out of existence, a process that value of the vacuum energy and the amount of energy needed to explain the accelerated expansion.
This discrepancy is not an issue for the second theory, as it does not invoke the concept of dark energy at all. Instead, it explains the accelerated expansion of the universe by positing that across very large distances—billions of light-years—gravity no longer works as Einstein’s general theory of relativity predicts. Such a since it means that this theory may be easier to test than the dark energy theory.
What this question is testing
Your task
Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.
Common trap
Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.
Winning move
Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.