Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT132 S3 P2 Q10 Explanation

Late Heavy Bombardment

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocal PurposeScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

A vigorous debate in astronomy centers on an epoch in planetary history that was first identified by analysis of rock samples obtained in lunar missions. Scientists discovered that the major craters on the Moon were created by a vigorous bombardment of debris approximately four billion years ago—the so-called late heavy bombardment (LHB). of Earth since, until the LHB ended, life could not have survived here.

Various theoretical approaches have been developed to account for both the evidence gleaned from samples of Moon rock collected during lunar explorations and the size and distribution of craters on the Moon. Since the sizes of LHB craters suggest they were formed by large bodies, some astronomers believe that the LHB was Earth-Moon system, because the debris from such an event would have been swept up relatively quickly.

New support for the hypothesis that a late bombardment extended throughout the inner solar system has been found in evidence from the textural features and chemical makeup of a meteorite that has been found on Earth. It seems to be a rare example of a Mars rock that made its way to more such rocks and perhaps obtain surface samples from other planets in the inner solar system.

What this question is testing

Local Purpose

Topic

The author is explaining a real argument among astronomers: about 4 billion years ago, the Moon got pummeled with debris. The question is — was it just the Moon and Earth, or the whole inner solar system, and was it really a sudden burst or just the end of a long fade-out?

Framework

Present Debate. Three different positions are laid out side by side. The author doesn't pick a winner, but they do flag a piece of evidence that nudges things one direction.

Main Point

Here's the simpler version: scientists agree the Moon got hit with a lot of debris around 4 billion years ago. They disagree about three things — whether it was a sudden cataclysm or just a tapering off, where the debris came from, and how big a region was affected. A new piece of evidence (a Mars rock that landed on Earth and dates to that era) hints that other planets got hit too, which would favor the "whole inner solar system" view. But the author is careful: one rock isn't enough.

P1: What everyone agrees on

Lunar rocks tell us the Moon got hammered around 4 billion years ago. If the Moon got hit, Earth almost certainly did too — which is why life couldn't have started yet.

P2: Where they disagree (three theories)

One group: a big asteroid or comet broke apart and scattered debris across the inner solar system. Another group: nothing dramatic happened — what we're seeing on the Moon is just the end of a long fade. A third group: there was a sudden burst, but it only hit the Earth-Moon system, because the debris would have been swept up too quickly to spread further.

P3: The Mars rock

A meteorite found on Earth looks like it came from Mars and dates to about 4 billion years ago. If that's right, both Mars and the Moon were being hit at the same time — which supports the "whole inner solar system" view. The author closes with a polite caution: this is one rock. To really know, scientists need more rocks like it and ideally samples from other planets.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

The author mentions that the LHB “should also have struck Earth” (first

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Purpose11% picked this

    support a particular theory of the extent of

    The theories that explain the LHB are not introduced until the second paragraph.

  2. Out of Scope13% picked this

    question the lack of LHB evidence found

    The lack of LHB evidence found on Earth is not discussed in the passage.

  3. Wrong Purpose2% picked this

    advocate certain scientific models for the origins of life

    No specific models of the origin of life on Earth are discussed or supported in the passage.

  4. Correct66% picked this

    provide a reason why scientists are interested in studying

    Why this is right

    This matches the purpose of the second half of the first paragraph as described in the passage map.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Wrong Purpose7% picked this

    introduce additional support for the dating of

    The support for the dating of the LHB is earlier in the first paragraph (first paragraph). The purpose of the end of the first paragraph is to provide a reason why scientists are interested in studying the LHB.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free