Reading Comprehension

PT132 · S3 · P2 · Q9 Late Heavy Bombardment

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

A vigorous debate in astronomy centers on an epoch in planetary history that was first identified by analysis of rock samples obtained in lunar missions.

Topic

The Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB) — a roughly four-billion-year-old episode of intense cratering on the Moon — and a debate about its origin and extent.

Framework

Present Debate. The author lays out three competing theories about the LHB, then describes a single piece of new evidence and the cautious conclusion researchers can draw from it.

Main Point

Three views about the LHB compete (asteroid/comet breakup, no cataclysm at all, and a brief Earth-Moon-only cataclysm). A recent Mars rock found on Earth tentatively supports the view that the LHB extended throughout the inner solar system, but more samples are needed before any conclusion is firm.

P1: What the LHB is

Lunar samples revealed that the Moon's major craters formed in a vigorous bombardment ~4 billion years ago — the LHB. Projectiles that hit the Moon should also have struck Earth, with profound consequences: until the LHB ended, life couldn't have survived.

P2: Three theories

Theory 1: a single large body (asteroid or comet) broke up and peppered the inner solar system. Theory 2: there was no cataclysm; the Moon's evidence is just the tail end of a long, declining bombardment, with later impacts erasing earlier ones. Theory 3: there was a sharply defined cataclysm, but it was brief and confined to the Earth-Moon system.

P3: A Mars rock provides new (limited) support

A rare meteorite, evidently a Mars rock knocked from Mars and landed on Earth, has been dated to about 4 billion years old — which would mean Mars and the Moon were both being bombarded at the same time. That suggests the LHB extended through the inner solar system. But the author cautions that scientists need many more such rocks, and ideally surface samples from other planets, before drawing firm conclusions.

9.

The author's attitude toward arguments that might be based on the evidence of the rock mentioned in the passage as being from Mars (second sentence of the last paragraph) can most accurately be described as

  1. ambivalence because the theory of

    Wrong View

    The author isn't torn between finding the theory appealing and finding it hard to believe. The author treats the Mars-rock claim as plausible (it seems to be an example of a Mars rock), but just warns us that it would be very shallow support currently. We need to find more evidence like this.

    6% picked this

  2. Correct

    caution because even if the

    Why this is right

    This is a weird answer, but it appealingly does start with the idea of caution, which we were predicting. Is the author thinking, "even if we know the rock came from Mars, it's unwise to draw general conclusions with copious (i.e. plentiful) evidence?" Yeah, I guess so. She says: if the rock is indeed from Mars, it suggests X, but to really determine X, we need many more such examples So this is a pretty good match for the text!

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    81% picked this

  3. skepticism because it seems unlikely

    Wrong View

    The author accepts that this rock was likely from Mars: it seems to be an example of a Mars rock that made its way to Earth after being dislodged from Mars.

    6% picked this

  4. curiosity because many details of

    Out of Scope

    The passage doesn't mention unpublished details about the rock's travel or chemistry. The first sentence of P3 actually indicates that the chemical makeup has been determined, and the 3rd mentions that it has already been dated at four billion years old.

    5% picked this

  5. outright acceptance because the origins

    Opposite

    The author is implicitly accepting that the rock came from Mars, four billion years ago. And she accepts that the rock is evidence of LBH impacting more than just the Earth + Moon. But it's a tiny piece of evidence, she says. She wouldn't outright accept arguments such as "the LHB extended throughout the inner solar system" based solely on this rock. She says that to truly determine how pervasive the LHB was, we'll need to locate many more such rocks and maybe even get some surface samples.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free