Reading Comprehension

PT132 · S3 · P2 · Q11 Late Heavy Bombardment

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

A vigorous debate in astronomy centers on an epoch in planetary history that was first identified by analysis of rock samples obtained in lunar missions.

Topic

The Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB) — a roughly four-billion-year-old episode of intense cratering on the Moon — and a debate about its origin and extent.

Framework

Present Debate. The author lays out three competing theories about the LHB, then describes a single piece of new evidence and the cautious conclusion researchers can draw from it.

Main Point

Three views about the LHB compete (asteroid/comet breakup, no cataclysm at all, and a brief Earth-Moon-only cataclysm). A recent Mars rock found on Earth tentatively supports the view that the LHB extended throughout the inner solar system, but more samples are needed before any conclusion is firm.

P1: What the LHB is

Lunar samples revealed that the Moon's major craters formed in a vigorous bombardment ~4 billion years ago — the LHB. Projectiles that hit the Moon should also have struck Earth, with profound consequences: until the LHB ended, life couldn't have survived.

P2: Three theories

Theory 1: a single large body (asteroid or comet) broke up and peppered the inner solar system. Theory 2: there was no cataclysm; the Moon's evidence is just the tail end of a long, declining bombardment, with later impacts erasing earlier ones. Theory 3: there was a sharply defined cataclysm, but it was brief and confined to the Earth-Moon system.

P3: A Mars rock provides new (limited) support

A rare meteorite, evidently a Mars rock knocked from Mars and landed on Earth, has been dated to about 4 billion years old — which would mean Mars and the Moon were both being bombarded at the same time. That suggests the LHB extended through the inner solar system. But the author cautions that scientists need many more such rocks, and ideally surface samples from other planets, before drawing firm conclusions.

11.

The author implies that all theoretical approaches to the LHB would agree on which one of the following?

  1. the approximate duration of the

    Wrong View

    We don't actually have a quoted time period from any of the three theories. But Theory 2 says the bombardment was a long, declining process, while Theory 3 stresses its brief duration. So duration is not common ground.

    9% picked this

  2. the origin of the debris

    Wrong View

    The origin of the debris is another point of disagreement. Theory 1 says an asteroid or comet broke apart; Theory 3 says debris came from a body within the Earth-Moon system; Theory 2 says no cataclysm at all. The theories explicitly diverge on origin.

    15% picked this

  3. Correct

    the idea that cratering decreased

    Why this is right

    All three theories explain the same Moon evidence and accept that cratering decreased after the LHB. The cataclysm theories say a burst happened and then ended; the no-cataclysm theory says the LHB is itself the tail of a long decline. Either way, cratering goes down after that period, so yes they'd agree that the cratering tapered off around 4 billions years ago.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    53% picked this

  4. the idea that the LHB

    Unsupported

    The passage says only that until the LHB ended, life could not have survived on Earth, not that life existed and was destroyed. There is no claim that life had already started before the LHB.

    16% picked this

  5. the approximate amount of debris

    Wrong View

    The amount of debris is also a point of disagreement. The asteroid-breakup theory implies a lot of widely scattered debris; the Earth-Moon-only theory implies a smaller, more localized amount; the no-cataclysm theory implies no special burst at all. So debris amount is not common ground.

    8% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free