Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT132 S2 Q12 Explanation

Paleontologist: Plesiosauromorphs were gigantic

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Paleontologist: Plesiosauromorphs were gigantic, long-necked marine reptiles that ruled the oceans during the age of the dinosaurs. Most experts believe that plesiosauromorphs lurked and quickly ambushed their prey. However, plesiosauromorphs probably hunted by chasing their prey over long distances. Plesiosauromorph the wings of birds specialized for long-distance flight.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the paleontologist's

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope / Weaken1% picked this

    Birds and reptiles share many physical features because they descend from

    Any physical features other than fins and wings are not relevant. Furthermore, this provides an alternative explanation for the similarity between fins and wings that may not involve similar hunting patterns.

  2. Too Strong1% picked this

    During the age of dinosaurs, plesiosauromorphs were the only marine reptiles that had

    The argument states that plesiosauromorphs had long, thin fins, but the argument does not need to assume that they were the only marine animals that had such fins.

  3. Unsupported / Too Strong9% picked this

    A gigantic marine animal would not be able to find enough food to meet the caloric requirements dictated by its body size if it

    This does not connect the premise (shape of fins) with the conclusion (hunting strategy). Furthermore, while it would prove that plesiosauromorphs hunted by chasing prey over long distances, it applies broadly to all gigantic marine animals, which the argument does not need to assume.

  4. Reversal7% picked this

    Most marine animals that chase prey over long distances are specialized

    This reverses the assumption that marine animals specialized for long-distance swimming are likely to chase their prey over long distances.

  5. Correct82% picked this

    The shape of a marine animal's fin affects the way the animal swims in the same way as the shape of a bird's wing

    Why this is right

    This connects the common form between the fins and wings to function those fins and wings perform.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free