Reading Comprehension

PT128 · S1 · P4 · Q25 Riddled Basins of Attraction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result.

Topic

A challenge to the scientific principle that experimental results must be replicable, based on the concept of riddled basins of attraction in physical systems.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Sommerer and Ott’s computer model suggests there can be physical systems so sensitive to initial conditions that replicating experimental results becomes impossible, forcing scientists to reconsider the core assumption that results must always be replicable. (The Most Valuable Sentence: This idea is most clearly stated at the end of the last paragraph.)

P1: Introducing the Problem with Replicability

Most scientists believe experimental results aren’t trustworthy unless they can be repeated, but Sommerer and Ott have come up with a system where even the tiniest change in initial conditions changes the outcome.

P2: The Lake/Land Analogy for Riddled Basins

The scientists explain their idea by analogy: imagine where water spilled on land always drains to one lake or another based on where it lands and the landscape’s shape. The "basin of attraction" is all the land where water runs to one particular lake.

P3: Why Predicting Outcomes Isn’t Always Possible

Sometimes the boundaries between basins of attraction are so irregular (fractal) that you can’t even reliably predict which lake the water will end up in unless you actually do the experiment—tiny changes can send the water along a totally different path.

25.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the work of Sommerer and Ott?

  1. skeptical of the possibility that

    Contradiction

    The author is persuaded that Sommerer and Ott’s model possibly describes many unstable systems (fifth paragraph).

    9% picked this

  2. convinced of the existence of

    Too Strong / Contradiction

    The author is not convinced that numerous unstable systems exist, but is convinced that they possibly exist (fifth paragraph). Furthermore, the author is convinced that if they do, a foundation of scientific research would be called into question (fifth paragraph).

    6% picked this

  3. convinced of the existence of

    Too Strong

    The author is not convinced that numerous unstable systems exist, but is convinced that they possibly exist (fifth paragraph).

    14% picked this

  4. persuaded of the possibility that

    Contradiction

    The author is convinced that if they do exist, a foundation of scientific research would be called into question (fifth paragraph).

    15% picked this

  5. Correct

    persuaded of the possibility that

    Why this is right

    The author is persuaded that Sommerer and Ott’s model possibly describes many unstable systems (fifth paragraph) and convinced that if it does, a foundation of scientific research would be called into question (fifth paragraph).

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    56% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free