Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT128 S1 P4 Q25 Explanation

Riddled Basins of Attraction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.

Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.

In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.

In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.

There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, "metaphorical examples of riddled be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the work of

Answer choices

  1. Contradiction9% picked this

    skeptical of the possibility that numerous unstable systems exist but confident that the existence of numerous unstable systems would call into question

    The author is persuaded that Sommerer and Ott’s model possibly describes many unstable systems (fifth paragraph).

  2. Too Strong / Contradiction8% picked this

    convinced of the existence of numerous unstable systems and unsure if the existence of numerous unstable systems calls into question one

    The author is not convinced that numerous unstable systems exist, but is convinced that they possibly exist (fifth paragraph). Furthermore, the author is convinced that if they do, a foundation of scientific research would be called into question (fifth paragraph).

  3. Too Strong16% picked this

    convinced of the existence of numerous unstable systems and confident that the existence of numerous unstable systems calls into question one

    The author is not convinced that numerous unstable systems exist, but is convinced that they possibly exist (fifth paragraph).

  4. Contradiction17% picked this

    persuaded of the possibility that numerous unstable systems exist and unsure if the existence of numerous unstable systems would call into question

    The author is convinced that if they do exist, a foundation of scientific research would be called into question (fifth paragraph).

  5. Correct50% picked this

    persuaded of the possibility that numerous unstable systems exist and confident that the existence of numerous unstable systems would call into question

    Why this is right

    The author is persuaded that Sommerer and Ott’s model possibly describes many unstable systems (fifth paragraph) and convinced that if it does, a foundation of scientific research would be called into question (fifth paragraph).

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free