Reading Comprehension

PT128 · S1 · P4 · Q26 Riddled Basins of Attraction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result.

Topic

A challenge to the scientific principle that experimental results must be replicable, based on the concept of riddled basins of attraction in physical systems.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Sommerer and Ott’s computer model suggests there can be physical systems so sensitive to initial conditions that replicating experimental results becomes impossible, forcing scientists to reconsider the core assumption that results must always be replicable. (The Most Valuable Sentence: This idea is most clearly stated at the end of the last paragraph.)

P1: Introducing the Problem with Replicability

Most scientists believe experimental results aren’t trustworthy unless they can be repeated, but Sommerer and Ott have come up with a system where even the tiniest change in initial conditions changes the outcome.

P2: The Lake/Land Analogy for Riddled Basins

The scientists explain their idea by analogy: imagine where water spilled on land always drains to one lake or another based on where it lands and the landscape’s shape. The "basin of attraction" is all the land where water runs to one particular lake.

P3: Why Predicting Outcomes Isn’t Always Possible

Sometimes the boundaries between basins of attraction are so irregular (fractal) that you can’t even reliably predict which lake the water will end up in unless you actually do the experiment—tiny changes can send the water along a totally different path.

26.

According to the passage, Sommerer and Ott's model differs from a riddled basin of attraction in which one of the following ways?

  1. In the model, the behavior

    Too Weak

    In the model, it is impossible to predict the general destination (fourth paragraph), but in chaotic uncertainty the general destination can be predicted.

    8% picked this

  2. In a riddled basin of

    Too Strong

    In a riddled basin of attraction, only water spilled along the boundary between one basin and another is chaotic (third paragraph).

    7% picked this

  3. Correct

    In the model, it is

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the fourth paragraph and the third paragraph.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    58% picked this

  4. In a riddled basin of

    Contradiction

    In a riddled basin of attraction, water spilled at two adjacent points will not always make its way to the same destination (third paragraph).

    18% picked this

  5. In the model, two particles

    Contradiction

    In the model, particles placed successively at a given point will not always travel to the same destination (fourth paragraph).

    10% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free