Reading Comprehension

PT128 · S1 · P4 · Q24 Riddled Basins of Attraction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result.

Topic

A challenge to the scientific principle that experimental results must be replicable, based on the concept of riddled basins of attraction in physical systems.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Sommerer and Ott’s computer model suggests there can be physical systems so sensitive to initial conditions that replicating experimental results becomes impossible, forcing scientists to reconsider the core assumption that results must always be replicable. (The Most Valuable Sentence: This idea is most clearly stated at the end of the last paragraph.)

P1: Introducing the Problem with Replicability

Most scientists believe experimental results aren’t trustworthy unless they can be repeated, but Sommerer and Ott have come up with a system where even the tiniest change in initial conditions changes the outcome.

P2: The Lake/Land Analogy for Riddled Basins

The scientists explain their idea by analogy: imagine where water spilled on land always drains to one lake or another based on where it lands and the landscape’s shape. The "basin of attraction" is all the land where water runs to one particular lake.

P3: Why Predicting Outcomes Isn’t Always Possible

Sometimes the boundaries between basins of attraction are so irregular (fractal) that you can’t even reliably predict which lake the water will end up in unless you actually do the experiment—tiny changes can send the water along a totally different path.

24.

Given the information in the passage, Sommerer and Ott are most likely to agree with which one of the following?

  1. It is sometimes impossible to

    Unsupported

    Although the passage states that notches and zigzags can create fractal properties (third paragraph), it does not state that it is possible to identify them in them in a particular region.

    4% picked this

  2. It is sometimes impossible to

    Contradiction

    Typically, the general destination is known in a chaotic system (fourth paragraph).

    20% picked this

  3. Correct

    It is sometimes impossible to

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the first paragraph.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    64% picked this

  4. It is usually possible to

    Unsupported

    The passage does not say how often the path water will travel can be predicted when spilled at a point not on the boundary between two basins of attraction. In “chaos,” the general destination can be predicted but the path and exact destination cannot be (fourth paragraph).

    7% picked this

  5. It is usually possible to

    Unsupported

    The passage doesn’t discuss using a particle’s starting point and eventual destination to determine the path it took.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free