Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT126 S1 Q8 Explanation

Economist: Historically, sunflower seed

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Economist: Historically, sunflower seed was one of the largest production crops in Kalotopia, and it continues to be a major source of income for several countries. The renewed growing of sunflowers would provide relief to Kalotopia's farming industry, which is quite unstable. Further, sunflower oil can consumer, at little cost to Kalotopia's already fragile environment.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

The economist's statements, if true, most strongly support which one of

Answer choices

  1. Negated Premise4% picked this

    Kalotopia's farming industry will deteriorate if sunflowers are not

    The statements suggest that Kalotopia’s farming industry would benefit if growing sunflower seed was renewed, but that doesn’t not imply that the farming industry would deteriorate if the practice is not renewed.

  2. Unsupported Relationship10% picked this

    Stabilizing Kalotopia's farming industry would improve the economy without damaging

    This suggests that anything that stabilizes the farming industry would benefit the economy without damaging the environment, but the statements only offered renewed growing of sunflower seed as means to achieve those outcomes.

  3. Too Strong - Speculation1% picked this

    Kalotopia's farming industry would be better off now if it had never ceased to grow any of the crops that

    From the statements alone it is impossible to say how the farming industry in Kalotopia would have fared had it never abandoned growing sunflower seed.

  4. Correct81% picked this

    A crop that was once a large production crop in Kalotopia would, if it were grown there again, benefit that

    Why this is right

    This is supported from the first, third, and fourth statements in the passage. It’s given that sunflower seed was once a large production crop in Kalotopia (first statement), that it would benefit Kalotopia’s farmers (third statement) and general economy (fourth statement).

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unsupported Comparison4% picked this

    Sunflower seed is a better crop for Kalotopia from both the environmental and the economic viewpoints than are most crops

    Nothing in the statements compares the benefits to Kalotopia of growing sunflower seed with the benefits of growing other crops that could be grown there.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free