Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT122 S3 P2 Q12 Explanation

African Art Classification

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Through the last half century, the techniques used by certain historians of African art for judging the precise tribal origins of African sculptures on the basis of style have been greatly refined. However, as one recent critic of the historians’ classificatory assumptions has put it, the idea that the distribution of a . . a decided falsification of the very life of art in Africa.”

Objects and styles have often been diffused through trade, most notably by workshops of artists who sell their work over a large geographical area. Styles cannot be narrowly defined as belonging uniquely to a particular area; rather, there are important “centers of style” throughout Africa where families, clans, and workshops produce sculpture art historians who attempt to assign particular objects to individual groups on the basis of style.

One such center of style is located in the village of Ouri, in central Burkina Faso, where members of the Konaté family continue a long tradition of sculpture production not only for five major neighboring ethnic groups, but in recent times also for the tourist trade in Ouagadougou. The Konaté sculptors are subtly different that few people outside of the area can distinguish Nuna masks from Ko masks.

Perhaps historians of African art should ask if objects in similar styles were produced in centers of style, where artists belonging to one ethnic group produced art for all of their neighbors. Perhaps it is even more important to cease attempting to break down large regional styles into finer and finer tribal clear, one cannot readily tell which group produced an object by analyzing fine style characteristics.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following does the author attribute to the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: nontraditional materials0% picked this

    use of nontraditional materials in

    The 3rd paragraph doesn't mention any materials used by the Konate sculptors. Are their masks made of clay? Wood? Shells? We have no idea.

  2. Correct84% picked this

    production of sculptures in several distinct styles that are nevertheless very similar

    Why this is right

    The 3rd paragraph tells us that the Konate sculptors are "able to distinguish the characteristics of the five style in which they carve". And it ends by saying, "although they can identify the styles they carve, the characteristic patterns are so subtly different that few people outside of the area can distinguish Nuna masks from Ko masks". We might worry that several means "3 or 4", whereas the end of this paragraph is only naming two styles that are very similar to one another. But the Nuna and Ko were just two examples of the five ethnic groups for which the Konate family produce sculptures. It's very reasonable to think that if the 2 that we spotlight are similar, at least one of the remaining 3 is also similar (or that some of the remaining 3 are similar to each other).

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope: innovations / influence3% picked this

    stylistic innovations that have influenced the work of other sculptors in a

    The 3rd paragraph doesn't mention any "innovations". It stresses how the Konate can faithfully replicate the traditional styles. It doesn't sound like they're inventing any of their own, let alone influencing the work of other sculptors.

  4. Too Strong: only4% picked this

    adoption of a carving style that was previously used only by members of

    We know that the Konate is good at adopting the carving style of each of the five ethnic groups it services, but we have no idea if those ethnic groups are the only other tribe that's ever used that carving style.

  5. Out of Scope: introduction9% picked this

    introduction of the practice of producing sculptures for

    We heard in the 3rd that the Konate family produces sculptures for neighboring groups, but we never heard that they invented / introduced the practice.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free