Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT122 S3 P2 Q11 Explanation

African Art Classification

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Through the last half century, the techniques used by certain historians of African art for judging the precise tribal origins of African sculptures on the basis of style have been greatly refined. However, as one recent critic of the historians’ classificatory assumptions has put it, the idea that the distribution of a . . a decided falsification of the very life of art in Africa.”

Objects and styles have often been diffused through trade, most notably by workshops of artists who sell their work over a large geographical area. Styles cannot be narrowly defined as belonging uniquely to a particular area; rather, there are important “centers of style” throughout Africa where families, clans, and workshops produce sculpture art historians who attempt to assign particular objects to individual groups on the basis of style.

One such center of style is located in the village of Ouri, in central Burkina Faso, where members of the Konaté family continue a long tradition of sculpture production not only for five major neighboring ethnic groups, but in recent times also for the tourist trade in Ouagadougou. The Konaté sculptors are subtly different that few people outside of the area can distinguish Nuna masks from Ko masks.

Perhaps historians of African art should ask if objects in similar styles were produced in centers of style, where artists belonging to one ethnic group produced art for all of their neighbors. Perhaps it is even more important to cease attempting to break down large regional styles into finer and finer tribal clear, one cannot readily tell which group produced an object by analyzing fine style characteristics.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

The passage provides the most support for which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: practically indistinguishable16% picked this

    Some of the sculptures that the Konaté family produces are practically indistinguishable from those produced by certain other

    Putting "practically" in front of indistinguishable makes this softer than saying, "Some Konate sculptures are identical to those of other sculptors from far away". But it's still a very strong idea. We don't have any text that justifies saying that we could hold up a sculpture made by the Konate family and one made by a sculptor far from Burkina Faso, and the two sculptures would be nearly impossible to tell apart. All we know from the passage is that the Konate sculptors do make some masks that then get shipped out to five major neighboring ethnic groups. These groups may still be in Burkina Faso, so we can't really justify "far from Burkina", and even though the Konate sculptors are using the tribal style of each ethnic group, that doesn't mean that a sculpture made by a sculptor who lives in that neighboring area would be practically indistinguishable.

  2. Unsupported Comparison9% picked this

    The carving styles used by some members of the Konaté family are distinctly different from those

    Everything we heard about the Konate family was a monolithic truth applied to the entire family. We didn't hear about any differences within the family, such as "some members use a carving style different from other members". We know that the family overall uses different carving styles, but it might be that every member of the family is fluent is all those different carving styles. The test writers often create Unsupported Comparisons by "dividing up a group", pitting some family members vs. other members, in this case.

  3. Out of Scope: family collaboration2% picked this

    Other families of sculptors in Burkina Faso collaborate with the Konaté family

    There's nothing in that 3rd paragraph that sounds like different families of sculptors are working with the Konate family. The Konate family is the only family of sculptors mentioned in the passage.

  4. Correct73% picked this

    The Konaté family produces masks for some African ethnic groups other than the Nuna

    Why this is right

    We're told early in the 3rd paragraph that the Konate family produce sculptures for "five major neighboring ethnic groups, as well as for the tourist trade". We're additionally told that the Konate sculptors can distinguish the characteristics of "the five styles in which they carve". The examples provided with the Nuna and Ko are but 2 of these 5. This answer is just reflecting that there are 3 other ethnic groups, neighboring the Konate in Burkina Faso, that the Konate produce things for. The loose end of this answer choice (the reason that it's Most Supported, instead of Must Be True), is that we only know that the Konate family produces sculpture for these 3 other ethnic groups. We don't know 100% for sure that the Konate make masks for them. But given that the two examples of sculpture production we're given from the Konate family (both of which are masks), it's a plausible guess that the Konate also make masks for at least one of those other 3 groups they produce sculptures for.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: oldest0% picked this

    The village of Ouri where the Konaté family produces sculptures is the oldest center of

    Superlative alert! The village of Ouri is identified as "one such" center of style. It doesn't get identified with any distinguishing superlative like "the oldest" center of style.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free