Logical Reasoning

PT119 · S2 · Q1 Cox: The consumer council did

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Cox: The consumer council did not provide sufficient justification for its action when it required that Derma-35 be recalled from the market.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

1.

Cox and Crockett disagree over whether

  1. Derma-35 should remain on the

    Trap

    1% picked this

  2. blemishes are sometimes caused by

    Trap

    0% picked this

  3. the council based its decision

    Trap

    1% picked this

  4. Correct

    the council gave an adequate

    Why this is right

    Answer D is correct.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    97% picked this

  5. inflammation is a serious health

    Trap

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free