Reading Comprehension

PT114 · S3 · P4 · Q23 Medical Ethics Training

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the greatest challenges facing medical students today, apart from absorbing volumes of technical information and learning habits of scientific thought, is that of remaining empathetic to the needs of patients in the face of all this rigorous training.

Topic

How medical students can become more empathetic and better prepared for real ethical dilemmas through studying narrative literature as part of their ethics training.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The author argues that while traditional ethics training in medical schools is too theoretical to foster empathy and real-world ethical reasoning, incorporating narrative literature can help students develop the flexible moral imagination they need to face modern ethical dilemmas as compassionate doctors. Most Valuable Sentence: (end of P1) and (end of final paragraph)

P1: The Problem—Empathy Lost in Medical Training

Medical students risk losing touch with patients' personal needs and the ethical side of being a doctor because their training is so focused on technical and scientific aspects. The author suggests that immersing students solely in science is not enough, and proposes that studying narrative literature could be one way to help students stay empathetic.

P2: Issues with Current Ethics Education

Currently, med schools teach ethics in a very philosophical, abstract way, which doesn't really help students deal with real-world situations where ethical dilemmas are messy and complicated. The author believes that ethics courses that use narrative literature, rather than just theory, are more helpful, because literature exposes readers to a diverse range of human experiences and perspectives.

P3: Why Narrative Literature Works

Reading stories helps students develop "flexible ethical thinking." By engaging with characters' moral dilemmas from various viewpoints, readers stretch their moral imagination and are forced to consider perspectives that differ from their own—super helpful skills for doctors facing real-life patient situations.

23.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most likely agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. The heavy load of technical

    Trap

    17% picked this

  2. Students learn more about ethics

    Trap

    4% picked this

  3. The traditional method of ethical

    Trap

    10% picked this

  4. The failings of an abstract,

    Trap

    2% picked this

  5. Correct

    Neither scientific training nor traditional

    Why this is right

    Answer E is correct.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    67% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free