Reading Comprehension

PT114 · S3 · P4 · Q24 Medical Ethics Training

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the greatest challenges facing medical students today, apart from absorbing volumes of technical information and learning habits of scientific thought, is that of remaining empathetic to the needs of patients in the face of all this rigorous training.

Topic

How medical students can become more empathetic and better prepared for real ethical dilemmas through studying narrative literature as part of their ethics training.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The author argues that while traditional ethics training in medical schools is too theoretical to foster empathy and real-world ethical reasoning, incorporating narrative literature can help students develop the flexible moral imagination they need to face modern ethical dilemmas as compassionate doctors. Most Valuable Sentence: (end of P1) and (end of final paragraph)

P1: The Problem—Empathy Lost in Medical Training

Medical students risk losing touch with patients' personal needs and the ethical side of being a doctor because their training is so focused on technical and scientific aspects. The author suggests that immersing students solely in science is not enough, and proposes that studying narrative literature could be one way to help students stay empathetic.

P2: Issues with Current Ethics Education

Currently, med schools teach ethics in a very philosophical, abstract way, which doesn't really help students deal with real-world situations where ethical dilemmas are messy and complicated. The author believes that ethics courses that use narrative literature, rather than just theory, are more helpful, because literature exposes readers to a diverse range of human experiences and perspectives.

P3: Why Narrative Literature Works

Reading stories helps students develop "flexible ethical thinking." By engaging with characters' moral dilemmas from various viewpoints, readers stretch their moral imagination and are forced to consider perspectives that differ from their own—super helpful skills for doctors facing real-life patient situations.

24.

Which one of the following is most likely the author's overall purpose in the passage?

to advise medical schools on
How vs. Why
The passage is definitely advising medical schools to implement a narrative-based approach, but it's not telling them how to implement it (which teachers to hire / where to fit it in the med student's curricular journey / which works of literature to cover / etc.) Instead, the author is basically establishing the value of having a narrative-based approach and also answering some potential objections to doing so.
6% picked this
to argue that the current
Wrong Emphasis: doesn't mention Solution
Given that this was a Problem / Solution type passage, we want the Solution front and center in our correct answer to Main Point or Primary Purpose. This answer feels more like a Challenge Position type passage, but the author wasn't spending her time chopping down the current methods and saying that they're counter-productive (actually make the situation worse). She just starts by identifying "one of the greatest challenges" for med students, identifies "training in ethics that focus on narrative literature" as one means of addressing that challenge, and then spends the bulk of the passage explaining how "narrative ethic training" could be beneficial. When it comes to the current methods (relying heavily on abstract, philosophical ethics), the author says that "the conceptual clarity provided by [the current methods] can be valuable, but it contributes little to understanding of everyday human experience". Saying current methods contribute little means they aren't helping much. Saying current methods are counterproductive mean that they're actually hurting.
9% picked this
to argue that the ethical
Contradicted
Contradicted: foreshadows pitfalls Wrong Emphasis: situational ethics There's no reason we should be expecting situational ethics to show up in our correct answer. It was a tiny bit player, not one of the starring roles. Furthermore, in the final paragraph, the author is anticipating objections to her recommendation for narrative based ethics by saying, "Don't worry -- it's not headed for the same pitfalls of situational ethics. It's not going to mean that we relinquish all moral principles, as we unfortunately do with situational ethics."
1% picked this
Correct
to propose an approach to
Why this is right
This sounds the most like "to offer a Solution to a Problem". The problem, traced out in the beginning of the passage, was that med students get so bogged down in the science and technical language of what they're learning that they risk "disconnecting from the personal and ethical aspects of doctoring" (i.e. the human dimension of medicine). The solution that the author proposes is to have ethical training that's based in narrative literature. The 2nd paragraph establishes that the current theoretical approach to ethics fails to capture the human dimension: - theorizing about ethics contributes little to the understanding of everyday human experience - a true foundation in ethics must be predicated on an understanding of human behavior - such literature attaches its readers so forcefully to the concrete and varied world of human events
Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
78% picked this
to demonstrate the value of
Wrong Emphasis: doesn't mention Solution
The author's main goal is to sell us on the idea of using narrative literature to teach ethics to med students. She thinks that this is one way of achieving a well-designed ethics education for med students. This answer has nothing to do with "convincing us that narrative literature is a valuable tool for ethics training". This answer is saying that the author is trying to "convince us that a well-designed ethics education is worth it / it has value". According to this answer, the bulk of the passage is spent explaining to us how a good ethics education will LATER yield value. The first paragraph definitely alludes to some of the potential value: - it will helps physicians grabble with modern ethical dilemmas - it will help them develop new ways of thinking about and interacting with patients But the author establishes that strong ethical training has value (in the 1st paragraph) so that she can then suggest a means of obtaining that strong ethical training (narrative literature), which she then defends in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4.
6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free