Reading Comprehension

PT114 · S3 · P4 · Q22 Medical Ethics Training

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the greatest challenges facing medical students today, apart from absorbing volumes of technical information and learning habits of scientific thought, is that of remaining empathetic to the needs of patients in the face of all this rigorous training.

Topic

How medical students can become more empathetic and better prepared for real ethical dilemmas through studying narrative literature as part of their ethics training.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The author argues that while traditional ethics training in medical schools is too theoretical to foster empathy and real-world ethical reasoning, incorporating narrative literature can help students develop the flexible moral imagination they need to face modern ethical dilemmas as compassionate doctors. Most Valuable Sentence: (end of P1) and (end of final paragraph)

P1: The Problem—Empathy Lost in Medical Training

Medical students risk losing touch with patients' personal needs and the ethical side of being a doctor because their training is so focused on technical and scientific aspects. The author suggests that immersing students solely in science is not enough, and proposes that studying narrative literature could be one way to help students stay empathetic.

P2: Issues with Current Ethics Education

Currently, med schools teach ethics in a very philosophical, abstract way, which doesn't really help students deal with real-world situations where ethical dilemmas are messy and complicated. The author believes that ethics courses that use narrative literature, rather than just theory, are more helpful, because literature exposes readers to a diverse range of human experiences and perspectives.

P3: Why Narrative Literature Works

Reading stories helps students develop "flexible ethical thinking." By engaging with characters' moral dilemmas from various viewpoints, readers stretch their moral imagination and are forced to consider perspectives that differ from their own—super helpful skills for doctors facing real-life patient situations.

22.

Which one of the following most accurately represents the author's use of the term "moral imagination" in the second sentence of the third paragraph?

a sense of curiosity, aroused
Curiosity vs. Empathy
This doesn't sound like it's aimed precisely enough at the target. Yes, people engaging their moral imagination are being curious in a way, but that noun is not a good proxy for empathy / understanding. The rest of the answer talks about "the development of problems", which doesn't sound specifically enough like we're referring to moral or ethical dilemmas. This answer is seemingly trying to entice students with Word-Bait, because the beginning of the "moral imagination" sentence talks about "grasping the development".
8% picked this
a faculty of seeking out
Contradicted
This feels relatively tempting, in its emphasis of ethical controversies. But in the "moral imagination" sentence, it says that we're engaging with the story "not as one's own but nevertheless as something recognizable and worthy of attention". This answer says that we'd be "identifying oneself with one side or another".
4% picked this
a capacity to understand the
Out of Scope: solutions
The blurb we get about "moral imagination" never says anything that resembles the reader creating "creative and innovative solutions" to the moral dilemmas. We're just meant to inhabit someone else's moral quandary, not as our own, but as something we can appreciate someone else might go through.
9% picked this
Correct
an ability to understand personal
Why this is right
"An ability to understand and to empathize ethically significant situations" sounds pretty awesome. What do they mean by understand personal aspects? - "grasping the development of characters" seems to allude to the idea of understanding the roles of different entities involved in the escalating moral crises. We're not just understanding the ethical dilemma itself but also the process / development of how persons in the story progress through them. What do they mean by "even if one is not a direct participant"? - "to engage with the story not as one's own"
Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
75% picked this
an ability to act upon
Out of Scope: act on principles
The blurb about using our moral imagination seems to only refer to reading and understanding the ethical dilemmas that characters in the story are going through. The passage never calls on us to come up with a solution or change how we act. It definitely doesn't suggest that we act on someone else's moral principle "just for the sake of variety".
4% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free