Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT146 S1 Q21 Explanation

Most kinds of soil contain clay

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel Flaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most kinds of soil contain clay, and virtually every kind of soil contains either sand or organic material, or both. Therefore, there must be some kinds of soil that contain both contain both clay and organic material.

What this question is testing

Parallel Flaw

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

The pattern of flawed reasoning in which one of the following arguments is most parallel to that in

Answer choices

  1. Bad Conclusion Match14% picked this

    Most pharmacies sell cosmetics. Virtually every pharmacy sells shampoo or toothpaste, or both. Therefore, if there are pharmacies that sell both cosmetics and toothpaste,

    This conclusion is conditional. We want a conclusion that makes two Some claims. The premises did match: Most pharmacies sell cosmetics. Most pharmacies sell shampoo or toothpaste. But the conclusion would have needed to be “Some places that sell cosmetics also sell shampoo, and some places that sell cosmetics also sell toothpaste”.

  2. Bad Conclusion Match9% picked this

    Undoubtedly, most pharmacies sell cosmetics, for almost all pharmacies sell either shampoo or toothpaste, or both, and there are some pharmacies that sell both

    This conclusion is a Most claim. We want a conclusion that makes two Some claims. The words “for, after all, since, because” (F.A.B.S.) directly indicate premises and indirectly indicate conclusions. Ideally, we don’t read any of this answer once we’ve already seen that the first claim was the conclusion and that the conclusion was a mismatch.

  3. Bad Conclusion Match4% picked this

    Most pharmacies sell cosmetics. Nearly all pharmacies sell shampoo or toothpaste, or both. Therefore, unless there are some pharmacies that sell both cosmetics and

    This conclusion is conditional. We want a conclusion that makes two Some claims. The premises did match: Most pharmacies sell cosmetics. Most pharmacies sell shampoo or toothpaste. But the conclusion would have needed to be “Some places that sell cosmetics also sell shampoo, and some places that sell cosmetics also sell toothpaste”.

  4. Weak Premise Match17% picked this

    Virtually every pharmacy that sells shampoo also sells toothpaste. Most pharmacies sell cosmetics. Therefore, there must be some pharmacies that sell both cosmetics and

    This conclusion makes two Some claims, so it’s worth reading. The problem is that the first premise isn’t saying “Most P’s are S or T”, it’s saying “Most P’s that are S are also T”. In the original argument, both Most claims were about the same group: “types of soil”. This answer would only match had the original argument said, Most pharmacies that sell shampoo also sells toothpaste. Most sandy soil has organic material. Consider the difference in meaning between these two claims: Most people have an iPhone or an Android phone. vs. Most people that have an iPhone also have an Android phone.

  5. Correct56% picked this

    Nearly all pharmacies sell either shampoo or toothpaste, or both. Therefore, since most pharmacies sell cosmetics, there must be some pharmacies that sell both

    Why this is right

    This has two Some claims in the conclusion, so it's worth reading. Premise 1: Most pharmacies sell cosmetics. Premise 2: Most pharmacies sell shampoo or toothpaste. Conclusion: Some cosmetics sell shampoo, and some cosmetics and toothpaste.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free