Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT143 S4 Q13 Explanation

An art critic, by ridiculing an artwork

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

An art critic, by ridiculing an artwork, can undermine the pleasure one takes in it; conversely, by lavishing praise upon an artwork, an art critic can render the experience of viewing the artwork more pleasurable. So an artwork’s artistic merit can depend it but also on those who critically evaluate it.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

The conclusion can be properly drawn if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Correct77% picked this

    The merit of an artistic work is determined by the amount of

    Why this is right

    This bridges the gap ?P or ?P -causes? ?M or ?M in the chain of causal reasoning, connecting the amount of pleasure one experiences when viewing an artwork and the artistic merit of an artwork.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Weak1% picked this

    Most people lack the confidence necessary for making their own evaluations

    That people lack the confidence to make their own evaluations of art does not imply that they are influenced by the evaluations of art critics.

  3. Weakens2% picked this

    Art critics understand what gives an artwork artistic merit better than

    This suggests that critics assess the artistic merit of an artwork, while the conclusion suggests that critical evaluations contribute to the artistic merit of an artwork.

  4. Too Weak6% picked this

    Most people seek out critical reviews of particular artworks before viewing

    While this would support the view that the pleasure experienced by people who view particular artworks is usually influenced by art critics, but this does not support a conclusion about the artistic merit of those artworks.

  5. Supports a Premise15% picked this

    The pleasure people take in something is typically influenced by what they think others

    This supports the first and second premises.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free