A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.
Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).
Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.
The pundit's argument requires the assumption that
other private companies would have
1% picked this
the city could have raised
Why this is right
Answer B is correct.
Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
93% picked this
municipal functions like assessing and
3% picked this
the revenue from parking fees
2% picked this
private companies assess and collect
1% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.