Reading Comprehension

PT142 · S3 · P1 · Q3 The Decline of Perfumery

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Given the amount of time and effort that curators, collectors, dealers, scholars, and critics spend on formulating judgments of taste in relation to oil paintings, it seems odd that so few are prepared to apply some of the same skills in exploring works of art that stimulate another sense altogether: that of smell.

Topic

Why great perfume isn’t considered a serious art form—despite strong similarities to painting and music.

Framework

Challenge Position (The author challenges the position that perfume is not taken seriously as art.)

Main Point

Even though perfume, like painting and music, is a sophisticated art that stimulates our senses and emotions, it isn’t taken as seriously as visual or musical arts, partly due to commercialization and neglect by art professionals. *Most Valuable Sentence*: "Why is great perfume not taken more seriously?" (end of P1 and developed throughout passage) and (P3).

P1: Surprise at Perfume’s Neglect by Art Professionals

Despite how much time experts spend evaluating visual arts, almost nobody in the art world approaches perfume with the same seriousness, even though some perfumes are true masterpieces.

P2: Comparing Painting and Perfumery Techniques

The passage draws parallels between painting and perfume-making, describing how both involve crafting complex creations from natural and synthetic materials, with both changing over time.

P3: Perfume as a Sophisticated, Emotional Art

Just as painters create moods and stories with color, skilled perfumers (“noses”) use scents to evoke deep emotional memories and experiences—making perfume as intimate and powerful as painting or music.

3.

The word "noses" (first sentence of the third paragraph) refers to

  1. Correct

    perfumers

    Why this is right

    The "noses" experiment with olfactory elements and produce combinations of sensations, which is the work of composing perfume. The passage confirms the reading two sentences later by calling the same figure "a brilliant perfumer."

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    96% picked this

  2. perfume collectors

    Bad Match

    Collectors acquire perfume; the "noses" produce it. The sentence describes experimenting with ingredients and composing sensations, which is creation, not collecting.

    1% picked this

  3. particular perfumes

    Bad Match

    The "noses" are the ones who experiment and produce; they are agents, not products. A perfume cannot experiment with olfactory elements. A perfumer can.

    1% picked this

  4. people with expertise in marketing

    Out of Support Window

    Marketing appears only in the fourth paragraph, as part of what ill-serves fine perfume today. It has nothing to do with the third paragraph's description of composing scents.

    2% picked this

  5. people with expertise in pricing

    Out of Support Window

    The people concerned with cost are the "cynical bean counters" of the fourth paragraph, who cheapen formulas for profit. We're looking for the geniuses who make the perfumes, not the people in boardrooms who decide on its retail price.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free