Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT142 S3 P1 Q4 Explanation

The Decline of Perfumery

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Given the amount of time and effort that curators, collectors, dealers, scholars, and critics spend on formulating judgments of taste in relation to oil paintings, it seems odd that so few are prepared to apply some of the same skills in exploring works of art that stimulate another sense altogether: that of to the fragrance counter in search of, say, Joy Parfum, the 1930 masterpiece by Henri Alméras.

And yet, the parallels between what ought to be regarded as sister arts are undeniable. Painters combine natural and, these days, synthetic pigments with media such as oils and resins, much as the perfumer carefully formulates natural and synthetic chemical compounds. The Old Masters deployed oil paint across the color spectrum, and appearance changes over time, because the tendency of oil paint is to become gradually more transparent.

So, too, talented “noses” experiment with complex configurations of olfactory elements and produce in symphonic combination many small sensations, at times discordant, sweet, bitter, melancholy, or happy, as the case may be. These combinations change and develop in sequence or in unison as the substance and its constituents evaporate at different rates, are in the same business as the artist who creates the illusion of life on canvas.

Perhaps one reason that truly great smells are so often undervalued is that perfumes are today made and distributed under the not particularly watchful gaze of a few large corporations. The cynical bean counters in Paris and Zurich do not hesitate to tamper with old formulas, insisting on the substitution of cheap is now hopelessly entangled with the international cosmetic dollar, and ill-served by marketing and public relations.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

The passage provides the most support for which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Correct86% picked this

    A work of art can bring about an aesthetic experience through the memories

    Why this is right

    Since this has such lovably weak wording (a work of art can do X), we would definitely prioritize researching it on a first pass. This aligns with the end of the 3rd paragraph, where the author is explaining why perfumes are no less an art form than other commonly-recognized art forms, and where she discusses the aesthetic experience they're creating: A brilliant perfumer may thus devise an imaginary world no less powerful, or intimate, than that of a great composer or painter, and in calling on our capacity to discover there some memory of childhood or of a long-forgotten experience, perfumers are in the same business as the artist who creates the illusion of life on canvas. What same business are they both in? Making art.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong: any9% picked this

    In any work of art, one can detect the harmonious combination of

    It's too strong to say that every single work of art has a detectable, harmonious combination of many small sensations. The author thought that this characterization applies both to oil paintings and perfumes, which are art. But we don't know if she thinks it applies to every single work of art. Also, the author tells us that some combinations are designed to be discordant, not harmonious.

  3. Too Strong: inevitably fail3% picked this

    A work of art will inevitably fail if it is created for the sake

    It's too strong to say that every single work of art created for the sake of commercial success will inevitably fail. Jordan Peele, for example, has directed three movies ("Get Out" / "Us" / "Nope") that were designed for the sake of commercial success and, according to film critics, succeed greatly as works of art.

  4. Too Strong: best1% picked this

    The best works of art improve

    The author never makes any statement saying that any work of art that could be considered among "the best" also improves with age (the farther you get from its release, the better it is).

  5. Unsupported Comparison: superior1% picked this

    Some forms of art are superior

    Like (A), the soft language of (E) would make us consider it more thoughtfully on a first pass. But, there's just no support in the passage for the author ranking one form of art higher than another. Overall, the author is trying to get people to consider perfume a form of art on the same level as other forms of art.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free