Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT142 S2 Q3 Explanation

Commentator: If a political administration

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Commentator: If a political administration is both economically successful and successful at protecting individual liberties, then it is an overall success. Even an administration that fails to care for the environment may succeed overall if it protects individual liberties. So far, the environment but has successfully protected individual liberties.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

If all of the statements above are true, then which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported6% picked this

    The present administration is economically

    Without knowing whether the ~ES administration is an overall success, it cannot be established whether its an economic success.

  2. Unsupported5% picked this

    The present administration is not an

    Without knowing whether the ~OS administration is an economic success, it cannot be established whether it’s an overall success.

  3. Correct85% picked this

    If the present administration is economically successful, then it is an

    Why this is right

    Since the administration has ES ? OS protected individual liberties, the first statement reduces to this relationship.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Contradiction1% picked this

    If the present administration had been economically successful, it would have cared

    The statements imply the ES + SPIL ? OS opposite. They suggest SPIL ? ~(OS ? CE) that the administration ES + SPIL did not need to care for ? ~(OS CE) the environment.

  5. Unsupported3% picked this

    If the present administration succeeds at environmental protection, then it will be

    The statements imply that if ES ? OS the administration succeeds economically, then it will be an overall success. But this says that caring for the CE ? OS environment implies that it will be an overall success.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free