A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.
Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.
Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.
Which one of the applicants, as described below, does NOT meet the manager’s requirements?
Joanne Bernstein has worked for
3% picked this
Alvin Johnson is a doctoral
5% picked this
Edward St. John has worked
Why this is right
Answer C is correct.
Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
77% picked this
Michael Roberts has published two
10% picked this
Alicia Arias holds an earned
5% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.