Logical Reasoning

PT14 · S2 · Q1 Rainfall in the drought-plagued metropolitan

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Rainfall in the drought-plagued metropolitan area was heavier than usual for the month of June.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

1.

Which one of the following, if true, helps to explain why the city’s water shortage was not alleviated by the first of July?

  1. Moderate restrictions on the industrial

    Trap

    2% picked this

  2. Because of the heavier rainfall,

    Trap

    4% picked this

  3. Correct

    People in the metropolitan area

    Why this is right

    Answer C is correct.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    91% picked this

  4. During the drought most residents

    Trap

    3% picked this

  5. The per capita rate of

    Trap

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free