Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT139 S2 P3 Q17 Explanation

The Birth of Chicano Theater

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most scholars of Mexican American history mark César Chávez’s unionizing efforts among Mexican and Mexican American farm laborers in California as the beginning of Chicano political activism in the 1960s. By 1965, Chávez’s United Farm Workers Union gained international recognition by initiating a worldwide boycott of grapes in an effort to get having initiated the Chicano theater movement, a movement that would reach its apex in the 1970s.

In the fall of 1965, Valdez gathered a group of striking farm workers and asked them to talk about their working conditions. A former farm worker himself, Valdez was no stranger to the players in the daily drama that was fieldwork. He asked people to illustrate what happened on the picket lines, audience to social action. Because actos were based on participants’ personal experiences, they had palpable immediacy.

In her book El Teatro Campesino, Yolanda Broyles-González rightly criticizes theater historians for having tended to credit Valdez individually with inventing actos as a genre, as if the striking farm workers’ improvisational talent had depended entirely on his vision and expertise for the form it took. She traces especially the actos’ connections in the European tradition of Valdez’s academic training, but a distinctive genre with connections to both.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Topic

The author is telling the founding story of Chicano theater in the 1960s and giving credit where credit is due — including correcting an oversimplified version of the story.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy.

Main Point

The simpler version: in 1965, the same year Chávez's farm-worker union got famous from the grape boycott, Luis Valdez approached him about using theater to organize farm workers. Valdez worked with striking farm workers, and they together created what they called "actos" — short, satirical sketches. People give Valdez sole credit for inventing this genre, but a scholar named Broyles-González says it's more accurate to call it a collective accomplishment. The workers had cultural roots in a similar earlier tradition called "carpas." Valdez's contribution was still crucial, but he wasn't the lone genius.

P1: Two 1965 events

Chávez's farm-worker union became internationally famous through the grape boycott. The same year, Valdez approached Chávez about using theater for organizing. The Teatro Campesino is credited with kicking off Chicano theater.

P2: How the actos got made

Valdez gathered striking workers and had them act out their picket-line experiences. He turned their improvisation into actos — short skits with a satirical edge that named a problem and pointed to a solution. Because they came from personal experience, they had real punch.

P3: A corrective

Some scholars credit Valdez personally with inventing the actos genre. The author, citing Broyles-González, says that's wrong. The actos drew on a real cultural tradition called carpas — informal satirical shows in tents that had been performed for working-class audiences along the Mexico-U.S. border. Many of the Teatro's farm-worker members probably had personal ties to carpas. So the actos were a collective creation, not a solo invention. Valdez's role was still crucial — he turned the raw material into a distinctive new genre.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

It can be inferred from the passage that Valdez most likely held which one of

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported3% picked this

    As a theatrical model, the carpas of the early twentieth century were ill-suited to the type of theater that he and the

    The passage does not indicate whether Valdez was even aware of carpas.

  2. Unsupported2% picked this

    Cesar Chavez should have done more to support the efforts of the Teatro Campesino to use theater to

    Valdez did approach Chavez about using theater to organize farm workers and the Teatro Campesino was the result (first paragraph), but Valdez does not suggest the support was insufficient.

  3. Out of Scope3% picked this

    Avant-garde theater in the European tradition is largely irrelevant to the theatrical expression of the concerns of

    Avant-garde theater in the European tradition is not discussed in the passage.

  4. Correct90% picked this

    Actors do not require formal training in order to achieve effective and artistically

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the first paragraph.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unsupported2% picked this

    The aesthetic aspects of a theatrical work should be evaluated independently of

    Valdez does not suggest how to evaluate either the aesthetic or political ramifications of theatrical work.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free