Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT139 S2 P3 Q18 Explanation

The Birth of Chicano Theater

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most scholars of Mexican American history mark César Chávez’s unionizing efforts among Mexican and Mexican American farm laborers in California as the beginning of Chicano political activism in the 1960s. By 1965, Chávez’s United Farm Workers Union gained international recognition by initiating a worldwide boycott of grapes in an effort to get having initiated the Chicano theater movement, a movement that would reach its apex in the 1970s.

In the fall of 1965, Valdez gathered a group of striking farm workers and asked them to talk about their working conditions. A former farm worker himself, Valdez was no stranger to the players in the daily drama that was fieldwork. He asked people to illustrate what happened on the picket lines, audience to social action. Because actos were based on participants’ personal experiences, they had palpable immediacy.

In her book El Teatro Campesino, Yolanda Broyles-González rightly criticizes theater historians for having tended to credit Valdez individually with inventing actos as a genre, as if the striking farm workers’ improvisational talent had depended entirely on his vision and expertise for the form it took. She traces especially the actos’ connections in the European tradition of Valdez’s academic training, but a distinctive genre with connections to both.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Topic

The author is telling the founding story of Chicano theater in the 1960s and giving credit where credit is due — including correcting an oversimplified version of the story.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy.

Main Point

The simpler version: in 1965, the same year Chávez's farm-worker union got famous from the grape boycott, Luis Valdez approached him about using theater to organize farm workers. Valdez worked with striking farm workers, and they together created what they called "actos" — short, satirical sketches. People give Valdez sole credit for inventing this genre, but a scholar named Broyles-González says it's more accurate to call it a collective accomplishment. The workers had cultural roots in a similar earlier tradition called "carpas." Valdez's contribution was still crucial, but he wasn't the lone genius.

P1: Two 1965 events

Chávez's farm-worker union became internationally famous through the grape boycott. The same year, Valdez approached Chávez about using theater for organizing. The Teatro Campesino is credited with kicking off Chicano theater.

P2: How the actos got made

Valdez gathered striking workers and had them act out their picket-line experiences. He turned their improvisation into actos — short skits with a satirical edge that named a problem and pointed to a solution. Because they came from personal experience, they had real punch.

P3: A corrective

Some scholars credit Valdez personally with inventing the actos genre. The author, citing Broyles-González, says that's wrong. The actos drew on a real cultural tradition called carpas — informal satirical shows in tents that had been performed for working-class audiences along the Mexico-U.S. border. Many of the Teatro's farm-worker members probably had personal ties to carpas. So the actos were a collective creation, not a solo invention. Valdez's role was still crucial — he turned the raw material into a distinctive new genre.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Based on the passage, it can be concluded that the author and Broyles-González hold essentially the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope6% picked this

    the influences that shaped carpas as a

    The influences that shaped carpas as a dramatic genre are not discussed by either the author or Broyles-González.

  2. Unsupported15% picked this

    the motives of theater historians in exaggerating the originality

    The motives of the theater historians in the third paragraph are not discussed in the passage.

  3. Correct71% picked this

    the significance of carpas for the development of the genre of

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the third paragraph.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope4% picked this

    the extent of Valdez's acquaintance with carpas as a

    The passage does not state whether Valdez was familiar with carpas as a dramatic form.

  5. Unsupported5% picked this

    the role of the European tradition in shaping Valdez's contribution to the

    While Valdez was trained in the European tradition (third paragraph), neither the degree nor the role of that influence is discussed in the passage.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free