Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT134 S2 Q14 Explanation

For one academic year

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

For one academic year all the students at a high school were observed. The aim was to test the hypothesis that studying more increased a student's chances of earning a higher grade. It turned out that the students who spent the most time studying did not earn grades as high as did that the results of the observation supported the initial hypothesis.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the researchers drew the

Answer choices

  1. Irrelevant Comparison15% picked this

    The students who spent the most time studying earned higher grades than did some students who studied for

    This answer compares some students with other students. This type of comparison cannot support the hypothesis that compares each student to themself.

  2. Too Weak2% picked this

    The students tended to get slightly lower grades as the academic

    Without knowing that students spent less time studying as the year progressed, this cannot support the comparison in the hypothesis.

  3. Correct69% picked this

    In each course, the more a student studied, the better his or her grade was

    Why this is right

    This supports the researchers’ hypothesis because this shows that for every student additional study improved their grade. It also fits the observation, while pointing to a different comparison.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope4% picked this

    The students who spent the least time studying tended to be students with no more than average

    Extracurricular activities are not relevant to whether additional study increases a student’s chances of earning a higher grade.

  5. Irrelevant Comparison10% picked this

    Students who spent more time studying understood the course material better than

    This answer compares some students with other students. This type of comparison cannot support the hypothesis that compares each student to themself.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free