Logical Reasoning

PT132 · S4 · Q18 If there are sentient beings

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

If there are sentient beings on planets outside our solar system, we will not be able to determine this anytime in the near future unless some of these beings are at least as intelligent as humans.

Conclusion

If there are sentient beings on planets outside our solar system, we won't be able to determine this anytime soon unless some of them are at least as intelligent as humans.

Evidence (X and Y)

We won't be able to send spacecrafts outside our solar system anytime soon. and Any sentient being on another planet capable of communicating with us in the near future would have to be as intelligent as we are.

Evaluate

There's a lot of symbol matching and conditional logic here, so we might go down the road of diagramming (watch the class recording, via the ▶︎ button on the highlighter toolbar, if you'd like to see a diagramming discussion).

But essentially the argument boils down to this missing link: if we can't send spacecraft there, then we'll need these aliens to be capable of communicating with us.

If we translate the "unless" in the conclusion into "if-not" form, the conclusion is saying, .

Why?

Because, .

We're trying to line up the Conclusion's verbiage with that of the Evidence so that it's clearer what's being assumed.

If I say, , then I'm assuming .

This argument is saying,

So it's assuming, .

We might skeptically attack that assumption by thinking,

The author would say,

We would then reply, "the only way for us to determine their existence is to send spacecraft there or have them communicate with us? Why are those the only two ways? Couldn't we detect their presence through some sort of bio-marker we can observe via spectral analysis? If they're communicating with each other via radio waves, couldn't we potentially pick up on their signal with a radio telescope? They might not be smart enough to send a signal to us, but we might be smart enough to detect signals they're sending to each other."

Goal

The author needs to rule out alternative modes of discovering sentient beings. In his head there are only two ways: 1. send a spacecraft 2. the aliens are capable of communicating with us

The author has established we can't do #1 anytime soon and thus is thinking that #2 is the only hope, but maybe there are other ways he's failing to consider.

To lock in his conclusion, we need an answer to convince us that these are the only two ways.

18.

The argument's conclusion can be properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed?

  1. There are no sentient beings

    Out of Scope - Opposite Group

    The issue is whether we can detect sentient beings outside our solar system, not within.

    2% picked this

  2. Any beings that are at

    Out of Scope: want to communicate

    Whether communication is desired with sentient beings outside our solar system is irrelevant to the argument.

    18% picked this

  3. If there is a sentient

    Premise Support

    This supports the first premise, but not the argument about detecting a sentient being outside our solar system.

    7% picked this

  4. Correct

    If a sentient being on

    Why this is right

    This answer convinces us that the only two ways to detect sentient beings outside the solar system are for us to send a spacecraft or to have them communicate with us. We could write this answer as a conditional that says, "If we can't send a spacecraft, then the only way to detect such beings is for them to communicate with us". The author's evidence established that we can't send a spacecraft anytime soon. So combining that idea with this answer, we know that "The only way to detect such beings anytime soon is for them to communicate with us". And the second premise says that "for them to communicate with us, they'd need to be at least as intelligent." So we can combine those two ideas to derive the conclusion: "The only way to detect such beings anytime soon is for them to be at least as intelligent as us".

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    45% picked this

  5. Any sentient beings on planets

    Reversed Premise

    This is just a conditional logic reversal of the second premise.

    27% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free