Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT132 S1 P3 Q21 Explanation

Dental Caries

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Because dental caries (decay) is strongly linked to consumption of the sticky, carbohydrate-rich staples of agricultural diets, prehistoric human teeth can provide clues about when a population made the transition from a hunter-gatherer diet to an agricultural one. Caries formation is influenced by several factors, including tooth structure, bacteria in carbohydrates’ texture and composition, since carbohydrates more readily stick to teeth.

Many researchers have demonstrated the link between carbohydrate consumption and caries. In North America, Leigh studied caries in archaeologically derived teeth, noting that caries rates differed between indigenous populations that primarily consumed meat (a Sioux sample showed almost no caries) and those heavily dependent on cultivated maize (a Zuni sample had 75 dependence on agriculture is, the higher its rate of caries formation will be.

Under some circumstances, however, nonagricultural populations may exhibit relatively high caries rates. For example, early nonagricultural populations in western North America who consumed large amounts of highly processed stone-ground flour made from gathered acorns show relatively high caries frequencies. And wild plants collected cariogenic potential, notably pinyon nuts and wild tubers.

Passage B Archaeologists recovered human skeletal remains interred over a 2,000-year period in prehistoric Ban Chiang, Thailand. The site’s early inhabitants appear to have had a hunter-gatherer-cultivator economy. Evidence population became increasingly dependent on agriculture.

Research suggests that agricultural intensification results in declining human health, including dental health. Studies show that dental caries is uncommon in pre-agricultural populations. Increased caries frequency may result from increased consumption of starchy-sticky foodstuffs or from alterations in tooth wear. The wearing down of tooth crown surfaces reduces caries formation by removing However, severe wear that exposes a tooth’s pulp cavity may also result in caries.

The diet of Ban Chiang’s inhabitants included some cultivated rice and yams from the beginning of the period represented by the recovered remains. These were part of a varied diet that also included wild plant and animal foods. Since both rice and or both should theoretically result in increased caries frequency.

Yet comparisons of caries frequency in the Early and Late Ban Chiang Groups indicate that overall caries frequency is slightly greater in the Early Group. Tooth wear patterns do not indicate tooth wear changes between Early and Late Groups that would explain this unexpected finding. It is more likely that, although dependence been a shift from sweeter carbohydrates (yams) toward rice, a less cariogenic carbohydrate.

What this question is testing

Application

Topic

The author of each passage is examining a long-running idea: that switching to agriculture (with all its carbohydrates) is bad for your teeth. Passage A reviews the evidence; Passage B looks at a site that doesn't fit the pattern.

Framework

Dual Passage.

Main Point

The simpler version: in general, when populations shift from hunting and gathering to farming, they get more cavities — sticky carb-heavy foods are bad for teeth. But it's not absolute. Passage A flags some hunter-gatherer populations who got plenty of cavities anyway (acorn flour, pinyon nuts). Passage B looks at Ban Chiang, where you'd expect cavities to rise as agriculture rose — but they actually went slightly down. The likely reasons: the diet stayed varied (no one food took over), and people seem to have shifted from yams (sticky and sweet) toward rice (less so).

Passage A: The general rule and its exceptions

Cavity rates correlate with carb-heavy agricultural diets. Leigh's comparison: meat-eating Sioux had almost no cavities, maize-eating Zuni had 75%. But some hunter-gatherers ate stuff that caused plenty of cavities anyway — like processed acorn flour and pinyon nuts.

Passage B: A site that doesn't fit

Ban Chiang in Thailand transitioned from a mixed economy toward more agriculture over 2,000 years. Theory says cavities should have risen. They actually fell slightly. Tooth-wear can't explain it. The best guesses: the diet stayed varied (not dominated by sticky carbs), and the carb mix shifted from yams (more cavity-causing) to rice (less so).

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

The evidence from Ban Chiang discussed in passage B relates to the generalization reported in the second paragraph of passage A (Second Paragraph of Passage A) in which

Answer choices

  1. Opposite: confirms4% picked this

    The evidence confirms the

    The evidence of Ban Chiang does not conform to the generalization, since as they went from Early to Late, they became increasingly dependent on agriculture but their rate of caries formation decreased slightly.

  2. Opposite: supports19% picked this

    The evidence tends to support the

    The evidence of Ban Chiang does not conform to the generalization, since as they went from Early to Late, they became increasingly dependent on agriculture but their rate of caries formation decreased slightly.

  3. Opposite: irrelevant1% picked this

    The evidence is irrelevant to the

    The evidence of Ban Chiang is relevant, since it includes information about dependence on agriculture and rates of caries formation, which is what the generalization was all about.

  4. Correct69% picked this

    The evidence does not conform to

    Why this is right

    Haha, okay this ended up being exactly like our prediction. That was an accident. But yes, we can sign off on this. The generalization is that "as dependence on agriculture goes up, rates of caries formation do too". And when it came to Ban Chiang, as dependence on agriculture went up, rates of caries formation actually fell slightly.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: generalization7% picked this

    The evidence disproves the

    Generalizations aren't the same as universals. A universal is a specific type of general claim that allows for no exceptions. But a generalization is just saying that something is "generally" true. It's generally colder on Christmas than it is on Easter, in the Northern Hemisphere. But that doesn't have to be true all the time. If there's one year where Christmas is warmer than Easter, that doesn't disprove that Christmas is generally colder than Easter. Another way to know this answer must be wrong is that if it were right, then (D) would also be right. If the evidence disproved a generalization, then it clearly failed to conform to the generalization. We can never pick an answer that would also imply another answer. Ban Chiang's evidence does not fit the general connection between dependence on agriculture and higher rates of caries, but it doesn't disprove that generalization. Similarly, the existence of an NBA player that's only 5'10" doesn't disprove the generalization that "in general, NBA players are taller than 6 feet".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free