Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT132 S1 P3 Q20 Explanation

Dental Caries

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Because dental caries (decay) is strongly linked to consumption of the sticky, carbohydrate-rich staples of agricultural diets, prehistoric human teeth can provide clues about when a population made the transition from a hunter-gatherer diet to an agricultural one. Caries formation is influenced by several factors, including tooth structure, bacteria in carbohydrates’ texture and composition, since carbohydrates more readily stick to teeth.

Many researchers have demonstrated the link between carbohydrate consumption and caries. In North America, Leigh studied caries in archaeologically derived teeth, noting that caries rates differed between indigenous populations that primarily consumed meat (a Sioux sample showed almost no caries) and those heavily dependent on cultivated maize (a Zuni sample had 75 dependence on agriculture is, the higher its rate of caries formation will be.

Under some circumstances, however, nonagricultural populations may exhibit relatively high caries rates. For example, early nonagricultural populations in western North America who consumed large amounts of highly processed stone-ground flour made from gathered acorns show relatively high caries frequencies. And wild plants collected cariogenic potential, notably pinyon nuts and wild tubers.

Passage B Archaeologists recovered human skeletal remains interred over a 2,000-year period in prehistoric Ban Chiang, Thailand. The site’s early inhabitants appear to have had a hunter-gatherer-cultivator economy. Evidence population became increasingly dependent on agriculture.

Research suggests that agricultural intensification results in declining human health, including dental health. Studies show that dental caries is uncommon in pre-agricultural populations. Increased caries frequency may result from increased consumption of starchy-sticky foodstuffs or from alterations in tooth wear. The wearing down of tooth crown surfaces reduces caries formation by removing However, severe wear that exposes a tooth’s pulp cavity may also result in caries.

The diet of Ban Chiang’s inhabitants included some cultivated rice and yams from the beginning of the period represented by the recovered remains. These were part of a varied diet that also included wild plant and animal foods. Since both rice and or both should theoretically result in increased caries frequency.

Yet comparisons of caries frequency in the Early and Late Ban Chiang Groups indicate that overall caries frequency is slightly greater in the Early Group. Tooth wear patterns do not indicate tooth wear changes between Early and Late Groups that would explain this unexpected finding. It is more likely that, although dependence been a shift from sweeter carbohydrates (yams) toward rice, a less cariogenic carbohydrate.

What this question is testing

Inference

Topic

The author of each passage is examining a long-running idea: that switching to agriculture (with all its carbohydrates) is bad for your teeth. Passage A reviews the evidence; Passage B looks at a site that doesn't fit the pattern.

Framework

Dual Passage.

Main Point

The simpler version: in general, when populations shift from hunting and gathering to farming, they get more cavities — sticky carb-heavy foods are bad for teeth. But it's not absolute. Passage A flags some hunter-gatherer populations who got plenty of cavities anyway (acorn flour, pinyon nuts). Passage B looks at Ban Chiang, where you'd expect cavities to rise as agriculture rose — but they actually went slightly down. The likely reasons: the diet stayed varied (no one food took over), and people seem to have shifted from yams (sticky and sweet) toward rice (less so).

Passage A: The general rule and its exceptions

Cavity rates correlate with carb-heavy agricultural diets. Leigh's comparison: meat-eating Sioux had almost no cavities, maize-eating Zuni had 75%. But some hunter-gatherers ate stuff that caused plenty of cavities anyway — like processed acorn flour and pinyon nuts.

Passage B: A site that doesn't fit

Ban Chiang in Thailand transitioned from a mixed economy toward more agriculture over 2,000 years. Theory says cavities should have risen. They actually fell slightly. Tooth-wear can't explain it. The best guesses: the diet stayed varied (not dominated by sticky carbs), and the carb mix shifted from yams (more cavity-causing) to rice (less so).

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

Each passage suggests which one of the following about

Answer choices

  1. Trap7% picked this

    Varieties that are cultivated have a greater tendency to cause caries than varieties

    Opposite of Passage A Unsupported Passage B In the final sentence of Passage A, it talks about wild carbs such as pinyon nuts and tubers that have high cariogenic potential. Passage B doesn't even really comment on cultivated vs. wild varieties of carbs.

  2. Unsupported Passage B Opposite Passage A3% picked this

    Those that require substantial processing do not play a role in

    Highly processed carbs are never discussed in passage B. They are talked about in the final paragraph of passage A, in which we hear about an "early nonagricultural (i.e. still hunter-gatherer) population who consumed large amounts of highly processed flour".

  3. Correct80% picked this

    Some of them naturally have a greater tendency than others to

    Why this is right

    This is somewhat close to our predicted overlap: both passages linked carb-rich foods to higher rates of caries. In Passage A, the final sentence provides support. If we identify certain wild plants (such as pinyon nuts and wild tubers) as having high cariogenic potential, then we're implying that there is a variety to the cariogenic potential of foods. In passage B, the final sentence says that the Ban Chiang group shifted from yams toward rice, which is a less cariogenic carb. So once again, the comparative modifier is telling us that carbs can vary in terms of their potential to cause caries. p.s. Carcinogenic = cancer-causing Cariogenic = caries-causing

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Opposite, if anything4% picked this

    Some of them reduce caries formation because their relatively high fiber content

    We thought the overlap was that both passages linked carb-rich foods to an increased potential for caries. This answer is saying some carb-rich foods reduce caries formation. In the 2nd paragraph of Passage A, they're saying that as people started eating more sticky carbs, they had less fiber/grit in their diet, so their teeth didn't wear down as much, which is why it was easier for caries (cavities / little spaces) in their teeth to form.

  5. Unsupported Passage B Opposite Passage A5% picked this

    The cariogenic potential of a given variety increases if it is cultivated rather than gathered

    This seems like functionally the same idea as answer choice (A). And once again, we would say that Passage B never makes a wild vs. cultivated distinction. And in Passage A, the only time they talk about wild carbs is to provide an example of a food with high caries potential (whereas this answer choice is saying wild carbs should have less cariogenic potential).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free