Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT131 S4 P3 Q20 Explanation

Sculptor Isamu Noguchi

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The Japanese American sculptor Isamu Noguchi (1904-1988) was an artist who intuitively asked—and responded to—deeply original questions. He might well have become a scientist within a standard scientific discipline, but he instead became an artist who repeatedly veered off at wide angles from the well-known courses followed by conventionally talented artists behind one particular sculpture typifies this aspect of his creativeness.

By his early twenties, Noguchi's sculptures showed such exquisite comprehension of human anatomy and deft conceptual realization that he won a Guggenheim Fellowship for travel in Europe. After arriving in Paris in 1927, Noguchi asked the Romanian-born sculptor Constantin Brancusi if he might become his student. When Brancusi said no, that he metals, other than the expensive, nonoxidizing gold, could be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections.

Noguchi wanted to create a sculpture that was purely reflective. In 1929, after returning to the United States, he met the architect and philosopher R. Buckminster Fuller, offering to sculpt a portrait of him. When Fuller heard of Noguchi's ideas regarding positive-light sculpture, he suggested using chrome-nickel steel, which Henry Ford, through Here, finally, was a permanently reflective surface, economically available in massive quantities.

In sculpting his portrait of Fuller, Noguchi did not think of it as merely a shiny alternate model of traditional, negative-light sculptures. What he saw was that completely reflective surfaces provided a fundamental invisibility of surface like that of utterly still waters, whose presence can be apprehended only when objects—a ship's mast, The viewer's awareness of the "invisible" sculpture's presence and dimensional relationships would be derived only secondarily.

Even after this stunning discovery, Noguchi remained faithful to his inquisitive nature. At the moment when his explorations had won critical recognition of the genius of his original and the next phase of his evolution.

What this question is testing

Inference

Topic

The author is telling a portrait story about the sculptor Isamu Noguchi — and what made his creative process distinctive.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author isn't arguing against anyone — they're celebrating Noguchi's habit of asking original questions.

Main Point

The simpler version: Noguchi could have been a scientist, and he brought a scientist's habit of mind to sculpture. He noticed that for thousands of years sculptors had been working with shadows because no shiny material was reliable. When chrome-nickel steel became available in the 1920s, he made fully reflective sculptures — and realized those surfaces don't just reflect, they go invisible, like still water. Then, when everyone was praising him, he moved on to whatever was next.

P1: Who Noguchi was

Someone who asked unusual questions and came at sculpture from odd angles.

P2: The first big realization

Working as Brancusi's stonecutter and polisher in Paris, Noguchi noticed something: every sculptor had always worked with shadows. Why? Because no metal except gold reflected light reliably. So sculptors had been forced into "negative light" by a material limitation — not by aesthetic choice.

P3: The right material appears

Buckminster Fuller pointed Noguchi to chrome-nickel steel — a new material from Henry Ford's automotive research that was permanently reflective and affordable in bulk. The material limit was gone.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The passage most strongly supports which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported1% picked this

    Prior to suggesting the sculptural use of chrome-nickel steel to Noguchi, Fuller himself had made architectural designs that called for

    The passage does not indicate whether Fuller had planned to use chrome-nickel steel in his own architectural designs.

  2. Unsupported2% picked this

    Noguchi believed that the use of industrial materials to create sculptures would make the sculptures

    The passage does not indicate Noguchi’s views on the commercial viability of sculptures using industrial materials.

  3. Contradiction46% picked this

    Noguchi's "invisible" sculpture appears to have no shape or dimensions of its own, but rather

    Noguchi’s “invisible” sculpture has shape and dimensions that are derived secondarily (fourth paragraph).

  4. Speculation7% picked this

    If a positive-light sculpture depicting a person in a realistic manner were coated with a metal subject to oxidation, it would eventually cease to

    The hypothetical considered here is not addressed in the passage.

  5. Correct44% picked this

    The perception of the shape and dimensions of a negative-light sculpture does not depend on its reflection of objects

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the second and fourth paragraphs.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free