Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT131 S4 P3 Q21 Explanation

Sculptor Isamu Noguchi

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The Japanese American sculptor Isamu Noguchi (1904-1988) was an artist who intuitively asked—and responded to—deeply original questions. He might well have become a scientist within a standard scientific discipline, but he instead became an artist who repeatedly veered off at wide angles from the well-known courses followed by conventionally talented artists behind one particular sculpture typifies this aspect of his creativeness.

By his early twenties, Noguchi's sculptures showed such exquisite comprehension of human anatomy and deft conceptual realization that he won a Guggenheim Fellowship for travel in Europe. After arriving in Paris in 1927, Noguchi asked the Romanian-born sculptor Constantin Brancusi if he might become his student. When Brancusi said no, that he metals, other than the expensive, nonoxidizing gold, could be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections.

Noguchi wanted to create a sculpture that was purely reflective. In 1929, after returning to the United States, he met the architect and philosopher R. Buckminster Fuller, offering to sculpt a portrait of him. When Fuller heard of Noguchi's ideas regarding positive-light sculpture, he suggested using chrome-nickel steel, which Henry Ford, through Here, finally, was a permanently reflective surface, economically available in massive quantities.

In sculpting his portrait of Fuller, Noguchi did not think of it as merely a shiny alternate model of traditional, negative-light sculptures. What he saw was that completely reflective surfaces provided a fundamental invisibility of surface like that of utterly still waters, whose presence can be apprehended only when objects—a ship's mast, The viewer's awareness of the "invisible" sculpture's presence and dimensional relationships would be derived only secondarily.

Even after this stunning discovery, Noguchi remained faithful to his inquisitive nature. At the moment when his explorations had won critical recognition of the genius of his original and the next phase of his evolution.

What this question is testing

Inference

Topic

The author is telling a portrait story about the sculptor Isamu Noguchi — and what made his creative process distinctive.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author isn't arguing against anyone — they're celebrating Noguchi's habit of asking original questions.

Main Point

The simpler version: Noguchi could have been a scientist, and he brought a scientist's habit of mind to sculpture. He noticed that for thousands of years sculptors had been working with shadows because no shiny material was reliable. When chrome-nickel steel became available in the 1920s, he made fully reflective sculptures — and realized those surfaces don't just reflect, they go invisible, like still water. Then, when everyone was praising him, he moved on to whatever was next.

P1: Who Noguchi was

Someone who asked unusual questions and came at sculpture from odd angles.

P2: The first big realization

Working as Brancusi's stonecutter and polisher in Paris, Noguchi noticed something: every sculptor had always worked with shadows. Why? Because no metal except gold reflected light reliably. So sculptors had been forced into "negative light" by a material limitation — not by aesthetic choice.

P3: The right material appears

Buckminster Fuller pointed Noguchi to chrome-nickel steel — a new material from Henry Ford's automotive research that was permanently reflective and affordable in bulk. The material limit was gone.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following inferences about the portrait of Fuller does the passage

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported3% picked this

    The material that Noguchi used in it had been tentatively investigated by other sculptors but not in direct

    The passage does not suggest that chrome-nickel steel had been investigated by other sculptors

  2. Correct44% picked this

    It was similar to at least some of the sculptures that Noguchi produced prior to 1927 in that

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the second paragraph.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Unsupported2% picked this

    Noguchi did not initially think of it as especially innovative or revolutionary and thus was surprised by

    Fuller’s reaction to his portrait by Noguchi is not discussed in the passage.

  4. Unsupported6% picked this

    It was produced as a personal favor to Fuller and thus was not initially intended to be noticed and

    The passage does not state that Noguchi produced the portrait of Fuller as a personal favor.

  5. Unsupported Comparison45% picked this

    It was unlike the sculptures that Noguchi had helped Brancusi to produce in that the latter's aesthetic effects did not depend on

    The sculptures that Noguchi helped Brancusi with were produced of stone, but may have depended on contrasts of light and shadow.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free