Reading Comprehension

PT131 · S4 · P3 · Q21 Sculptor Isamu Noguchi

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The Japanese American sculptor Isamu Noguchi (1904-1988) was an artist who intuitively asked—and responded to—deeply original questions.

Topic

Isamu Noguchi's creative process — using a "scientist's mind" to reframe a fundamental sculptural problem and create a new kind of "positive-light" sculpture using chrome-nickel steel.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author celebrates Noguchi's habit of asking deeply original questions and tells the story behind one particular sculpture as typical of his creativeness.

Main Point

Noguchi's defining trait was an inquisitive scientist's mind that pushed him to ask deeply original questions about sculpture itself — questions that led him to invent a new genre of "positive-light" reflective sculpture, after which he kept moving on to the next phase rather than settling into a style.

P1: Noguchi as a question-asker

Noguchi was an artist who intuitively asked deeply original questions. He could have been a scientist; instead he became an artist who veered off at wide angles from conventionally talented artists. The story behind one sculpture typifies his creativeness.

P2: Apprenticeship with Brancusi and the negative-light realization

By his early twenties, Noguchi won a Guggenheim and went to Paris in 1927. After Brancusi declined to take him as a student, Noguchi became Brancusi's stonecutter, also polishing Brancusi's brass and bronze. With his "scientist's mind," Noguchi recognized that sculptors had always relied on negative light (shadows) because no metal except expensive gold gave reliable positive-light reflections.

P3: The breakthrough — Fuller and chrome-nickel steel

Noguchi wanted to create a purely reflective sculpture. After returning to the U.S. in 1929, he met R. Buckminster Fuller and offered to sculpt his portrait. Fuller suggested chrome-nickel steel — newly available commercially via Henry Ford's research and development. Here was a permanently reflective surface, available economically in massive quantities.

21.

Which one of the following inferences about the portrait of Fuller does the passage most strongly support?

  1. The material that Noguchi used

    Unsupported

    The passage does not suggest that chrome-nickel steel had been investigated by other sculptors

    3% picked this

  2. Correct

    It was similar to at

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the second paragraph.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    44% picked this

  3. Noguchi did not initially think

    Unsupported

    Fuller’s reaction to his portrait by Noguchi is not discussed in the passage.

    2% picked this

  4. It was produced as a

    Unsupported

    The passage does not state that Noguchi produced the portrait of Fuller as a personal favor.

    5% picked this

  5. It was unlike the sculptures

    Unsupported Comparison

    The sculptures that Noguchi helped Brancusi with were produced of stone, but may have depended on contrasts of light and shadow.

    47% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free