A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Many jobs require little or no creativity and, in those positions, using creativity is more likely to be disruptive than innovative.
Furthermore, even if creativity were in demand, there is no evidence that it can be taught.
There is no good reason to suppose that promoting creativity is a proper goal of an employee training program.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn in the manager's argument?
Using creativity in jobs that
This is a premise in support of the argument’s main point.
3% picked this
Employee training programs are not
This restates a premise more strongly than it was made in the argument.
2% picked this
Many jobs require little or
This is a premise in support of the argument’s main point.
1% picked this
There is no good reason
Why this is right
This best paraphrases the argument’s main point.
Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
92% picked this
Creativity is in demand, but
The evidence does not actually concede that creativity is in demand.
3% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.