Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT130 S4 Q6 Explanation

Beginners typically decide

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Beginners typically decide each chess move by considering the consequences. Expert players, in contrast, primarily use pattern-recognition techniques. That is, such a player recognizes having been in a similar position before and makes a decision based of moves chosen on that prior occasion.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported Comparison1% picked this

    Beginning chess players are better at thinking through the consequences of chess moves

    While beginning chess players are more likely to play with this strategy, that does not make them better at it.

  2. Out of Scope3% picked this

    A beginning chess player should use pattern­ recognition techniques when deciding what

    What beginning chess players should do is not discussed in the statements.

  3. Unsupported Relationship3% picked this

    One's chess skills will improve only if one learns to use

    The argument does not rely on conditional logic as this answer suggests, but rather on a comparison.

  4. Correct91% picked this

    In playing chess, an expert player relies crucially on his or

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the third statement. By recalling information the expert player is relies on his or her memory.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unsupported Relationship2% picked this

    Any chess player who played other games that require pattern-recognition skills would thereby improve his

    That expert chess players rely on pattern-recognition as a strategy does not mean that playing other games that require pattern-recognition would benefit their chess skills.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free