Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT130 S3 Q13 Explanation

Journalists sometimes use historical photographs

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Journalists sometimes use historical photographs to illustrate articles about current events. But this recycling of old photographs overstates the similarities between past and present, and thereby denies the individual significance of those current events. Hence, the use of historical photographs in this manner by presenting current events as mere repetitions of historical incidents.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the conclusion of the argument to

Answer choices

  1. Reversal6% picked this

    Any practice by which journalists present current events as mere repetitions of historical incidents overstates the similarities

    This reverses the assumption of the argument.

  2. Correct73% picked this

    If the work of a journalist overstates the similarities between past and present, then it distorts public understanding of the present by presenting current

    Why this is right

    This bridges the gap in the argument between over-stating the similarities be-tween past and present and distorting public under-standing of the present.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong Trigger / Wrong Outcome14% picked this

    If a journalistic practice distorts public understanding of the present by overstating the similarities between past and present, then it denies the individual significance

    This answer contains a trigger that has not been established.

  4. Reversal4% picked this

    No article about a current event treats that event as merely a repetition of historical incidents unless it uses historical

    This reverses a relationship that bridges the first premise with the conclusion.

  5. Out of Scope2% picked this

    If journalists believe current events to be mere repetitions of historical incidents, then public understanding of the

    What journalists believe is not relevant to the argument.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free