Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT129 S1 Q11 Explanation

Cynthia: Corporations amply fund research

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Cynthia: Corporations amply fund research that generates marketable new technologies. But the fundamental goal of science is to achieve a comprehensive knowledge of the workings of the universe. The government should help fund those to further our theoretical knowledge of nature.

Luis: The basic goal of government support of scientific research is to generate technological advances that will benefit society as a whole. So only research that is expected to yield practical and medicine ought to be funded.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Cynthia's and Luis's statements provide the most support for the contention that they would disagree with each other about the truth of which one

Answer choices

  1. Half Scope11% picked this

    The government should help fund pure theoretical research because such research might have unforeseen practical applications in fields

    Luis would say NO, but we don’t know what Cynthia would say. We know that Luis would disagree, because he only wants to fund research that’s expected to have practical benefits (not might have benefits). But, we can’t say that Cynthia would agree with this, because Cynthia wanted to fund theoretical research in order to broaden our knowledge of the universe, not because it might lead to practical applications.

  2. Nobody Agrees12% picked this

    A proposed study of the effects of chemical fertilizers on crops, for the purpose of developing more-resistant and higher-yielding breeds,

    We wouldn't be able to derive this claim from either paragraph. This sounds like the sort of research Luis would be okay with funding (since it's potentially going to yield practical applications in agriculture). And Cynthia is advocating that the govt kick in some money to fund theoretical stuff. That doesn’t let us infer that she thinks the govt should not fund any practical stuff.

  3. Out of Scope17% picked this

    Although some research projects in theoretical science yield practical benefits, most do not, and so no research projects in theoretical science should

    We don’t know what either person would say about this. Neither person’s comments would allow us to infer what they believe about most theoretical projects. It also contains such a strong sweeping “NO theoretical projects” should be funded, that Luis might still say NO, since there could be a project in theoretical science that is still expected to yield practical applications, for which he would allow govt funding.

  4. Out of Scope5% picked this

    Research for the sole purpose of developing new technologies ought to be financed

    We wouldn’t be able to infer that either person would sign off on a claim this extreme. The idea that only corporations can finance a certain type of research is overly limiting. Even if you ignore the contentious issue of govt. funding, neither person weighed in on other types of financing, such as private donors or crowdsourced fundraising.

  5. Correct56% picked this

    Knowledge gained through basic scientific research need not be expected to lead to new and useful technologies in order for the

    Why this is right

    Cynthia would say YES, Luis would say NO. Cynthia thinks there are cases (theoretical research) when research is not expected to lead to practical discoveries but the govt should still fund it. Luis says that the govt should fund only when it is expected to lead to practical applications.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free