Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT127 S2 Q22 Explanation

The writing styles in works

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The writing styles in works of high literary quality are not well suited to the avoidance of misinterpretation. For this reason, the writing in judicial decisions, which are primarily intended as determinations of law, is rarely of high literary quality. However, it is not uncommon to find writing of high literary written decisions in cases heard by a panel of judges.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in

Answer choices

  1. Half Scope9% picked this

    It is not uncommon for more than one judge to have an influence on the way a

    Without knowing that written decisions are primarily the work of a single judge, this answer does not provide a possible explanation.

  2. Irrelevant Relationship8% picked this

    Unlike literary works, legal opinions rely heavily on the use of

    Without knowing whether writing of high literary quality can rely heavily on the use of technical terminology, this is not relevant to the argument. Furthermore, if such writing did rely on technical terminology, this would undermine one of the statement’s to be reconciled.

  3. Correct68% picked this

    The law is not to any great extent determined by

    Why this is right

    This ensures that dissenting opinions are not intended for something for which the writing styles in works of high literary quality are not well suited.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Irrelevant Relationship2% picked this

    Judges spend much more time reading judicial decisions than reading works of

    How much time judges spend reading judicial decisions and works of high literary quality does not explain why legal decisions are rarely of high quality while the writing in dissenting opinions often is of such high quality.

  5. Half Scope13% picked this

    Judicial decisions issued by panels of judges are likely to be more widely read than are judicial decisions issued by a single

    This only discusses legal decisions and so cannot explain the difference observed between legal decisions and dissenting opinions.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free