Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT126 S1 Q16 Explanation

Philosopher: An event is intentional

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Philosopher: An event is intentional if it is a human action performed on the basis of a specific motivation. An event is random if it is not performed on the basis of not explainable by normal physical processes.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following inferences conforms most closely to the

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Trigger4% picked this

    Tarik left the keys untouched on the kitchen counter, but he did not do so on the basis of a specific motivation. Therefore, the

    This appeals to the second of SM → R the philosopher’s principles. However, it fails to meet the trigger, since it does not include that the event is not explainable by normal physical processes.

  2. Correct89% picked this

    Ellis tore the envelope open in order to read its contents, but the envelope was empty. Nevertheless, because Ellis acted on the basis of

    Why this is right

    This conforms to the first HA + SM → I principle in the philosopher’s position. Ellis acted on the basis of a specific motivation and the action was performed by a human, so it follows that the event was intentional.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong Outcome3% picked this

    Judith's hailing a cab distracted a driver in the left lane. She performed the action of hailing the cab on the basis of a

    Judith did perform a human HA + SM → I action and it was performed with a specific motivation. However, the conclusion is that the driver’s becoming distracted was an intentional event, when it should be that Judith’s hailing a cab was an intentional event.

  4. Wrong Trigger2% picked this

    Yasuko continued to breathe regularly throughout the time that she was asleep. This was a human action, but it was not performed on the

    Yasuko performed a human action ~SM → R that was not performed on the basis of a specific motivation. Without knowing whether the evil is explainable by normal physical processes. It cannot be concluded that the event was random.

  5. Wrong Trigger1% picked this

    Henry lost his hold on the wrench and dropped it because the handle was slippery. This was a human action and is explainable by

    It could be argued that losing HA + NPP → I one's hold on the wrench and dropping it is an action that is not performed with a specific motivation. Regardless, the information does not state for sure whether the action was performed with a specific motivation. So it cannot be concluded that Henry's action was an international event.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free