Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT124 S2 Q15 Explanation

Midlevel managers at large corporations

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Midlevel managers at large corporations are unlikely to suggest reductions in staff in their own departments even are obviously overstaffed.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Each of the following, if true, supports the claim

Answer choices

  1. Supports1% picked this

    The compensation paid to midlevel managers is greater when they supervise

    This helps explain why midlevel managers don't want to reduce their bloated staffs: they get paid more when they supervise more workers.

  2. Supports2% picked this

    Midlevel managers have less work to do when their departments

    This helps explain why midlevel managers don't want to reduce their overstuffed staffs: they don't have to work as hard when their departments are overstaffed.

  3. Supports1% picked this

    Staff morale and productivity often suffer when workers are

    This helps explain why midlevel managers don't want to reduce their overstuffed staffs: they know that if they lay off some of their staff, the remaining workers will suffer a decrease in morale and productivity.

  4. Supports10% picked this

    Departmental workloads at most large corporations increase and decrease significantly

    This helps explain why midlevel managers don't want to reduce their overstuffed staffs: they know that the workload of the department is sometimes pretty low (so it feels like their are more workers than necessary) and other times the workload is very high (you're glad to have all hands on deck). So even though the staff feels bloated, the managers worry that they would lay off some excess workers, and then suddenly the workload of the department would skyrocket and they'd be screwed by not having enough workers.

  5. Correct86% picked this

    Many large corporations allow managers to offer early retirement as a means

    Why this is right

    This doesn't give any reason why midlevel managers would be averse to trimming down their overstaffed department. It actually seems to offer them an easy way to trim away workers: you can offer the older ones an early retirement.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free