Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT124 S1 Q4 Explanation

This region must find new ways

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

This region must find new ways to help business grow. After all, shoe manufacturing used to be a major local industry, but recently has experienced severe setbacks due to overseas competition, so there is a need for outdated public policy generally inhibits business growth.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn

Answer choices

  1. Correct83% picked this

    The region needs to find new ways to enhance

    Why this is right

    This best paraphrases the argument’s conclusion.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Evidence0% picked this

    Shoe manufacturing is no longer a major source of income in

    This is evidence in support of the argument’s conclusion.

  3. Evidence2% picked this

    Shoe manufacturing in the region has dramatically declined due to

    This is evidence in support of the argument’s conclusion.

  4. Intermediate Conclusion13% picked this

    Business in the region must expand into new areas

    This is an intermediate conclusion that is supported by a premise and that also supports the main conclusion.

  5. Evidence2% picked this

    Outdated public policy inhibits business growth in

    This is evidence in support of the argument’s conclusion.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free