Reading Comprehension

PT123 · S4 · P4 · Q27 Irish Pollen Record

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In tracing the changing face of the Irish landscape, scholars have traditionally relied primarily on evidence from historical documents.

Topic

How fossilized pollen analysis supplements (and sometimes corrects) the documentary record in tracing the Irish landscape's history.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author introduces pollen analysis as an additional method, walks through cases where it corrected or supplemented the documentary record, and notes its limits.

Main Point

Pollen analysis is a valuable supplement to the documentary record for studying Irish landscape change — sometimes correcting it (cereal cultivation in County Down predated the moldboard plough; flax was not actually cultivated in Down before the eighteenth century) — though pollen analysis has its own limits (it can't always identify species).

P1: The documentary record is fragmentary

Scholars traditionally relied on documentary evidence, but reliable accounts are scarce before the seventeenth century, and the surviving documents focus selectively on military or commercial matters.

P2: Pollen analysis as a supplement

Studies of fossilized pollen grains in peats and lake muds offer an additional method. Pollen identifies the plants that produced it and when. The findings can supplement or correct the documentary record.

P3: Example 1 — cereal grains in County Down

Pollen analysis at Long Lough shows significant cereal-grain pollen by 400 A.D. Historians had thought the heavy clay soil there couldn't have been tilled until the moldboard plough arrived in the seventh century. But cereal cultivation requires tilling — so the soils must have been successfully tilled before the new plough.

27.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the second paragraph and the final paragraph?

  1. The second paragraph proposes a

    Contradiction

    The fourth paragraph is a limiting example of the method described in the second paragraph.

    3% picked this

  2. The final paragraph describes a

    Too Strong

    The limitation in the fourth paragraph does not prevent the method described in the second paragraph from being viable.

    32% picked this

  3. Correct

    The final paragraph qualifies the

    Why this is right

    The second paragraph describes a new method for investigating vegetative landscape change, while the fourth paragraph describes a limitation of that method.

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    52% picked this

  4. The second paragraph describes a

    Contradiction

    The author is an advocate of the method described in the second paragraph.

    7% picked this

  5. The final paragraph offers procedures

    Contradiction

    The fourth paragraph limits the method described in the second paragraph.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free