Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT123 S4 P2 Q13 Explanation

The Capacity for Music

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrincipleSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The two passages discuss recent scientific research on music. They are adapted from two different papers scholarly conference.

Passage A Did music and human language originate separately or together? Both systems use intonation and rhythm to communicate emotions. Both can be produced vocally or with tools, and and language silently to themselves.

Brain imaging studies suggest that music and language are part of one large, vastly complicated, neurological system for processing sound. In fact, fewer differences than similarities exist between the neurological processing of the two. One could think of the two activities as different radio programs that can be broadcast over the same cultures composition is left to specialists. In language, by contrast, nearly everyone actively performs and composes.

Given their shared neurological basis, it appears that music and language evolved together as brain size increased over the course of hominid evolution. But the primacy of language over music that we can observe today suggests that language, not music, was the primary function natural selection operated on. Music, own, and most likely developed on the coattails of language.

Passage B Darwin claimed that since “neither the enjoyment nor the capacity of producing musical notes are faculties of the least [practical] use to man they must be ranked amongst the most mysterious with which he is endowed.” I suggest that the enjoyment of and the capacity to produce musical notes are mother and child that we can discover the evolutionary origins of human music.

Even excluding lullabies, which parents sing to infants, human mothers and infants under six months of age engage in ritualized, sequential behaviors, involving vocal, facial, and bodily interactions. Using face-to-face mother-infant interactions filmed at 24 frames per second, researchers have shown that mothers and infants jointly construct mutually improvised interactions in which are composed of musical elements— variations in pitch, rhythm, timbre, volume, and tempo.

What evolutionary advantage would such behavior have? In the course of hominid evolution, brain size increased rapidly. Contemporaneously, the increase in bipedality caused the birth canal to narrow. This resulted in hominid infants being born ever-more prematurely, leaving them much more helpless at birth. This helplessness necessitated longer, better maternal care. Under constitutes the capacity to make and enjoy music—would have conferred considerable evolutionary advantage.

What this question is testing

Principle

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following principles underlies the arguments in

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope2% picked this

    Investigations of the evolutionary origins of human behaviors must take into account the behavior

    Neither passage discusses nonhuman animals.

  2. Too Strong20% picked this

    All human capacities can be explained in terms of the evolutionary

    Both passages assume that some human capacities can be explained in terms of the evolutionary advantages they confer (third and sixth paragraph), but neither assumes this to be true for all human capacities.

  3. Half Scope14% picked this

    The fact that a single neurological system underlies two different capacities is evidence that those

    This underlies the argument in passage A (third paragraph), but not passage B.

  4. Out of Scope20% picked this

    The discovery of the neurological basis of a human behavior constitutes the discovery of the

    Neither passage discusses the essence of a human behavior.

  5. Correct43% picked this

    The behavior of modern-day humans can provide legitimate evidence concerning the evolutionary origins

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the second and fifth paragraph.

    Skill tested: Principle · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free