Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT123 S3 Q15 Explanation

A consumer magazine surveyed people

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought a psychologist’s help with a personal problem. Of those responding who had received treatment for 6 months or less, 20 percent claimed that treatment “made things a lot better.” Of those responding who had received longer treatment, 36 percent claimed that treatment more than 6 months is more effective than shorter-term treatment.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak6% picked this

    Of the respondents who had received treatment for longer than 6 months, 10 percent said that

    Without a comparison against the percentage of respondents who had received treatment for 6 months or less, this has no impact on the argument.

  2. Too Weak28% picked this

    Patients who had received treatment for longer than 6 months were more likely to respond to the survey than were those who had

    The difference in response rates between the two different groups is not strong enough to suggest the survey results are not representative.

  3. Correct62% picked this

    Patients who feel they are doing well in treatment tend to remain in treatment, while those who are doing

    Why this is right

    This weakens the argument by creating a difference between the two groups of survey respondents that could explain the difference in survey responses.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Weak2% picked this

    Patients who were dissatisfied with their treatment were more likely to feel a need to express their feelings about it and

    This applies to both groups and so cannot explain the difference in the survey respondents claims.

  5. Too Weak2% picked this

    Many psychologists encourage their patients to receive treatment for longer than

    That psychologists encourage their patients to receive treatment for longer than 6 months may suggest that the patients surveyed who received treatment longer than 6 months was larger than the group that received treatment for less than 6 months, but it does not explain the different responses of the groups of survey respondents.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free