Reza: Language requires the use of verbal signs for objects as well as for feelings.
Statements
conditionals (requires / only = right side)
Language → Use verbal signs for object/feelings
Ask for object by name → humans
Use verbal signs → ability to distinguish one for objects object from another
Ability to distinguish → Conceptual thought one object from others
Evaluate
Whenever we come across a conditional statement in an Inference question, we ask ourselves: 1. are there any other conditionals I could chain this up with? 2. are there any specific facts I could apply this conditional to (esp. in contrapositive form)
In this paragraph, there were four conditionals, signified by requires / only / requires / requires.
The "only" in the 2nd sentence seems designed as a distraction, because it's a very limited thought about asking for an egg or an apple by its name.
If we removed the 2nd sentence, we would see a pretty clear chain:
use of able to concept. Language → verb signs → disting. → thought for objects from others
The contrapositive of that chain (which they love to test), would say, 1. if you don't have conceptual thought 2. you aren't able to distinguish one object from another 3. so you can't use verbal signs for objects 4. so you can't have language
Goal
Look for something probably being derived from that rad conditional chain. In particular, we'd guess they want to reward us for seeing the contrapositive of the chain, so something like, .