Logical Reasoning

PT12 · S1 · Q23 The capture of a wild animal

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The capture of a wild animal is justified only as a last resort to save that animal’s life.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

23.

Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?

  1. Punishing a child is justified

    Trap

    2% picked this

  2. Parents who never punish a

    Trap

    2% picked this

  3. Correct

    Punishing a young child is

    Why this is right

    Answer C is correct.

    Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    93% picked this

  4. A teacher is entitled to

    Trap

    3% picked this

  5. Society has no right to

    Trap

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free