All highly successful salespersons are both well organized and self-motivated, characteristics absent from many salespersons who are not highly successful.
Statements
There are a handful of Conditional quantifiers (All, only those, no) and one non-conditional quantifier (many). The latter is our last priority. We should first think about how these conditionals would look, and see if there are any overlapping terms that would allow the conditionals to chain together.
Highly successful → well organized and salesperson self-motivated
~Highly successful → ~well known among salesperson peers
Self-motivated → does not regret salesperson career choices
Do any of these chain together? Yes, the first two should, since they both deal with highly successful salesperson and we have OPPOSITE ideas on the SAME side. If we contrapose the 2nd rule, we'll get this chain.
Well known → highly succ → well organized + among peers salesperson self-motivated
There is also an Overlapping Idea with self-motivated appearing in the first and last claim. We can actually chain on one more idea.
Well known → success → motivated → ~regret
What about the "many" fact? Many ~highly successful are ~well organized salespersons & ~self-motivated
Do either of those ideas trigger anything? Yes, we know that if you're not a highly successful salesperson, then you're not well known among your peers.
So we could derive a Trait Overlap: many people who are not (well organized) and not (self motivated) are also not well known.
Goal
Look for an answer rewarding chaining together the three conditionals (connecting "well known" with "organized/motivated" or "doesn't regret career choices") or an answer giving the Trait Overlap inference of not organized / not motivated paired up with not well known.