Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT117 S2 Q4 Explanation

The top 50 centimeters of soil

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The top 50 centimeters of soil on Tiliga Island contain bones from the native birds eaten by the islanders since the first human immigration to the island 3,000 years ago. A comparison of this top layer with the underlying 150 centimeters of soil—accumulated over 80,000 years—reveals that before humans arrived on Tiliga, of humans dramatically decreased the population and diversity of birds on Tiliga.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens3% picked this

    The bird species known to have been eaten by the islanders had few natural

    This indicates that bird species eaten by humans had few natural predators, implicitly ruling out an alternate explanation for why the birds dwindled in number and variety.

  2. Strengthens3% picked this

    Many of the bird species that disappeared from Tiliga did not disappear from other, similar, uninhabited

    This shows that similar birds persisted longer on uninhabited islands, suggesting a correlation between human presence and bird decline, reinforcing the causal link to humans. It's a No Cause, No Effect strengthener --- the islands that DIDN'T have humans arrive, DIDN'T have bird species disappearing.

  3. Correct86% picked this

    The arrival of a species of microbe, carried by some birds but deadly to many others, immediately preceded the

    Why this is right

    This introduces a microbe carried by some birds but deadly to others, which appeared just before humans arrived. It offers an alternate explanation for the bird decline unrelated to human activity, thus weakening the argument.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unclear Impact6% picked this

    Bones from bird species known to have been eaten by the islanders were found in the underlying

    If anything maybe this strengthens. It seems to be saying that some of the birds we know these islanders eat were on the island before humans arrived (since they show up in the older soil). If islanders are currently eating these birds, then those birds haven't gone extinct yet from the arrival of humans (but maybe they're on their way to going extinct).

  5. No Impact2% picked this

    The birds that lived on Tiliga prior to the first human immigration generally did

    This notes that birds prior to humans didn’t fly well but doesn’t explain their decline or introduce a factor that distinguishes pre-human and post-human periods in the bird population. If anything, this strengthens by making it more plausible that humans would be able to trap and kill these (non-flying) birds.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free