Reviewer: Although finalism—the view that there are purposes in nature—has been universally rejected, this book launches another attack on that view. Its arguments are based on a complete misunderstanding of the operation of pure chance in nature and so it fails is clearly more plausible than people have thought.
What this question is testing
Your task
Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.
Common trap
Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.
Winning move
Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.