Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT114 S2 Q22 Explanation

Some types of organisms originated

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Some types of organisms originated through endosymbiosis, the engulfing of one organism by another so that a part of the former becomes a functioning part of the latter. An unusual nucleomorph, a structure that contains DNA and resembles a cell nucleus, has been discovered within a plant known as a chlorarachniophyte. Two this gene if the nucleomorph were not the remains of an engulfed organism’s nucleus.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong4% picked this

    Only organisms of types that originated through endosymbiosis

    We're barely comfortable supporting the idea that this nucleomorph is the product of endosymbiosis. We can support that idea, but we can't prove it. So this answer, which is saying that "if an organism contains a nucleomorphs, it must have originated through endosymbiosis" is too strong. This was an unusual nucleomorph. So, even if this one did originate through endosymbiosis, there's no reason to think that this would be true of all organisms that have nucleomorphs. Inference questions love to put an answer in slot (A) that is very close to what we were anticipating.

  2. Too Strong: all18% picked this

    A nucleomorph within the chlorarachniophyte holds all of the genetic material of

    Nothing in this paragraph says anything as strong as "contains all the genetic material of some other organism". Furthermore, we think the nucleomorph was from the "other organism" that got engulfed by the chlorarachniophyte during endosymbiosis. This answer seems to be positing a third organism. You have the chlora, which ate the nucleomorph, but then the nucleomorph ate some other organism and got all of its genetic material?

  3. Opposite Relationship12% picked this

    Nucleomorphs originated when an organism endosymbiotically engulfed

    We know that the nucleomorph was part of the organism that got engulfed (presumably by the chlorarachniophyte). This answer is saying that the chlorarachniophyte got engulfed by the nucleomorph.

  4. Too Strong: unless7% picked this

    Two organisms will not undergo endosymbiosis unless at least one of them

    There's no way from this passage to derive such a severe connection between endosymbiosis and nucleomorphs. We can support that this unusual nucleomorph had something to do with endosymbiosis (since we know it was part an organism that got engulfed). But we can't say, as this answer does, that every single case of endosymbiosis involves a nucleomorph.

  5. Correct60% picked this

    Chlorarachniophytes emerged as the result of two organisms having

    Why this is right

    Since we know that the nucleomorph is the remains of an engulfed organism's nucleus and now is within a chlorarachniophyte, it seemed supportable to say that the nucleo was in organism Y, which got engulfed during endosymbiosis by the chlora. The weird part about this answer, to me, was the idea that there were two separate organisms that combined into the chlora. But, if we check the wording of endosymbiosis, it is the origination of an organism. One organism engulfs another, and the engulfee is still a functioning part of the engulfer. But that doesn't mean the resulting organism is still called by the name of the engulfing organism. A new organism has originated from this process.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free