A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.
Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.
Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.
Mark's and Carla's positions indicate that they disagree about the truth of which one of the following?
The purpose of writing history
1% picked this
The participants in a battle
8% picked this
Historians can succeed in conveying
3% picked this
Historians should aim to convey
Why this is right
Answer D is correct.
Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
88% picked this
Historians should use fictional episodes
0% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.