Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT112 S4 Q4 Explanation

A certain gene can be stimulated

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A certain gene can be stimulated by chemicals in cigarette smoke, causing lung cells to metabolize the chemicals in a way that makes the cells cancerous. Yet smokers in whom this gene is not stimulated have lung cancer from smoking as other smokers do.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

If the statements above are true, it can be concluded on the basis

Answer choices

  1. Correct90% picked this

    stimulation of the gene by chemicals in cigarette smoke is not the only factor affecting the risk for

    Why this is right

    This is appealingly weak language (X is not the only factor). Stimulation of the gene causes an elevated risk of lung cancer (causing cells in the lung to become cancerous). If stimulation of the gene were the only factor affecting risk of smokers getting lung cancer, then it would be impossible for people whose gene can't be stimulated to have the same risk. Since we're told that people whose gene doesn't get stimulated have just as high a risk, it means there must be some other thing that can also affect your risk of cancer.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope: nonsmokers5% picked this

    nonsmokers have as high a risk of developing lung cancer as do smokers in whom the gene

    There's no way we can derive a must be true about nonsmokers when we have zero information about nonsmokers.

  3. Contradicted3% picked this

    smokers in whom the gene has been stimulated are more likely to develop lung cancer

    The final sentence says that smokers with a stimulated gene have as high a risk of lung cancer as other smokers.

  4. Out of Scope: Other Chemicals2% picked this

    the gene is more likely to be stimulated by chemicals in cigarette smoke than

    We are only told about chemicals in cigarettes stimulating this gene. We have no idea if any other chemicals stimulate the gene.

  5. Out of Scope: Don't Have Gene1% picked this

    smokers are less likely to develop lung cancer if they do not

    We only talked about people who do have the gene, so we can't derive any must be true about people who don't have the gene.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free